Path: csiph.com!news.swapon.de!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!mx02.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Aleksandro <aleksandro@gmx.com>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.javascript
Subject: Re: references to DOM parts
Date: Fri, 1 Jan 2016 02:56:51 -0300
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 41
Message-ID: <n654a6$d2d$1@dont-email.me>
References: <DOM-20151230191146@ram.dialup.fu-berlin.de> <1etso5kfd39eq$.19v3fhasifklp$.dlg@40tude.net> <XnsA58171C47E6C6eejj99@194.109.6.166> <ujxqdr50bbzz.hihpzuog4tj6.dlg@40tude.net> <n63lbk$kss$1@dont-email.me> <XnsA581C4A8C44BAeejj99@194.109.6.166> <n63snt$nrq$1@dont-email.me> <4457635.ebrsGVpr3F@PointedEars.de>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Fri, 1 Jan 2016 05:54:14 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: mx02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="3bb0fced1de70649df863026b02cdb5f"; logging-data="13389"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+lstaTCx7xXGsvno5LHZfJffVcm4/fWp4="
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.5.0
In-Reply-To: <4457635.ebrsGVpr3F@PointedEars.de>
Cancel-Lock: sha1:HeZIRZLOmYfr4l+sMIMGYFCHa6I=
Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.javascript:29086

On 31/12/15 23:32, Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn wrote:
> Aleksandro wrote:
> 
>> On 31/12/15 15:19, Evertjan. wrote:
>>> Aleksandro <aleksandro@gmx.com> wrote on 31 Dec 2015 in
>>> comp.lang.javascript:
>>>> On 31/12/15 11:15, JJ wrote:
>>>>> It's like assigning a variable to the return value of removeChild()
>>>>> then re-insert the node into the document later using appendChild() or
>>>>> insertBefore(). Without saving a reference to the removed node, the
>>>>> node would be a garbage.
>           ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> What is that supposed to mean?
> 
>>>> I think would apply the same rules as to any Javascript object.
> 
> Which would be, and where would you look it up?
> 
>>> Is the Javascript-object garbage-collection the same as the
>>> DOM-tree-element one?
> 
> _element node_ in the _document_ tree, and no.
>  
>> DOM elements are normal Javascript objects, or should be.
> 
> Nonsense.
> 
>> Someone confirm please.
> 
> There is no “Javascript”, so there are no “Javascript objects” and no 
> “Javascript-object garbage-collection” and so on.
> 
> Please get the basics right before you post, and use the correct terminology 
> when you post.  There is enough nonsense about this topic on the Net 
> already.

Hello, you are kindly invited to come get off from your little arrogance
buble for a bit so you can actually explain things to all the (in your
sole opinion) misinformed.

Regards.