Path: csiph.com!usenet.pasdenom.info!weretis.net!feeder4.news.weretis.net!newsfeed.datemas.de!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: danca <cyberdanny@tiscalinet.it>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.javascript
Subject: Re: JS/ECMA script created table question [a bit OT]
Date: Mon, 25 Nov 2013 10:55:54 +0100
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 49
Message-ID: <l6v6rc$8o7$1@dont-email.me>
References: <bfev3vFcjrpU1@mid.individual.net> <l6u0bn$1ch$1@dont-email.me> <bffn6qFhhkoU1@mid.individual.net> <bffto1Fimm3U1@mid.individual.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Mon, 25 Nov 2013 09:55:57 +0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: mx05.eternal-september.org; posting-host="4932810ab1d3130d3bc0b201deed6ff9"; logging-data="8967"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+HWz2wA9hNBbbfdTe8+Ty9"
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130801 Thunderbird/17.0.8
In-Reply-To: <bffto1Fimm3U1@mid.individual.net>
Cancel-Lock: sha1:k2jvrZaJNqpYokMXNX6Er+9JRME=
Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.javascript:22178

Il 25/11/2013 04:16, Mel Smith ha scritto:
> Hi Dan:
>
>      I noticed that yo mentioned our Harbour language as your CGI app of
> choice.
> .
>      Great !
>
I am quite confident that xHarbour behaves the same. I use both, but for 
CGI development I decided to use Harbour because the support for many 
different Oses, where xHb is aimed in fact mainly to Windows.

>      As you know, I too usexHarbour as my CG app under Apache 2.2.22

Eh... as a regular in lang.xHarbour it's impossible not to know of you. :-)

>
>      You have also probably suffered under the effects of coding in two
> different languages every day, and having to change your 'coding hat'
> frequently.

Your can bet on it.

>
>      I have looked at your 'preview' code and underastand it, and will try to
> modify my html page to accommodate this stylesheet changing idea.
>
> Thanks again.
>
> -Mel

I am not fluent in js, so the solution I at the end of the tale went for 
costed me some effort. I hope this can save you some time.
I had to clash with js when I decided to go for web applications, and it 
has never been easy. I suppose we are in a similar situation.

>
> (btw, I'm glad I'm not alone in using the Harbour language (it can perhaps
> be described as 'Hi-C' -- but I have been cursed in the past for this usage)
> as the basis for my server CGI apps. Because its root and power comes from
> its database functions (hundreds of them), it is ideal for apps where the
> html pages it 'serves' are built from the underlying databases it controls.)
>
>
[OT]
Completely agree. If you follow Harbour mailing list too, I posted 
recently on this subject and gave a link to my Harbour-powered site.

Dan