Path: csiph.com!news.swapon.de!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail
From: Arno Welzel <usenet@arnowelzel.de>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.javascript
Subject: Re: Monkey gibberish
Date: Wed, 22 Dec 2021 10:31:04 +0100
Lines: 30
Message-ID: <j2g9ioF6kuhU2@mid.individual.net>
References: <ad3675d5-4a9e-4208-83f4-1e31161f8c0bn@googlegroups.com> <j2e0b8FnpfrU1@mid.individual.net> <12fe8900-9c57-4467-a59d-fed5fd2b30afn@googlegroups.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Trace: individual.net xL0jVvA46VMOmSnffS4z/g+g+i+darQ1DMdU6KHwR5IVINKQha
Cancel-Lock: sha1:9+KYcCJJlKZS6fYcLnNJBxT/ugE=
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Betterbird/91.4.1
Content-Language: de-DE
In-Reply-To: <12fe8900-9c57-4467-a59d-fed5fd2b30afn@googlegroups.com>
Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.javascript:40700

Jonas Thörnvall:

> tisdag 21 december 2021 kl. 13:41:21 UTC+1 skrev Arno Welzel:
>> Jonas Thörnvall:
>>> I have a bit hard to read monkey gibberish, is there a way to
>>> explain this to someone who is not fullfledged retarded?
>>> 
>>> .then(res => res.arrayBuffer()) .then(ArrayBuffer =>
>>> ctx.decodeAudioData(ArrayBuffer));
>>> 
>>> Specifically .then => Is there another way to write it that may
>>> not be gibberish?
>> Just because you don't know every detail about JavaScript does not
>> mean that this is "gibberish".
>> 
>> See:
>> 
>> <https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/JavaScript/Reference/Global_Objects/Promise>
>> 
[...]
> Yeah precisely those things have no importance for the user and
> should not have part of the syntax, its moronic.

They are not for "users" but for softwar developers.



-- 
Arno Welzel
https://arnowelzel.de