Path: csiph.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail
From: Arno Welzel <usenet@arnowelzel.de>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.javascript
Subject: Re: Using a single module
Date: Sat, 26 Sep 2020 23:36:14 +0200
Lines: 50
Message-ID: <ht9qidFsvb0U1@mid.individual.net>
References: <67Wdnb4wtM6Kr_nCnZ2dnUU7-aPNnZ2d@westnet.com.au> <hsolhpF9ljhU1@mid.individual.net> <2f1bf4d2-d350-4da1-8bfa-3af3a0ea60d3o@googlegroups.com> <ht43lqFmtc4U1@mid.individual.net> <2d750160-fd2a-47fe-b1ba-3a1067e81622o@googlegroups.com> <ht47nhFno5tU1@mid.individual.net> <a95dff26-3c75-4386-af45-60a2187f153bo@googlegroups.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Trace: individual.net 3v/YUD+wJgVzYIGwSE6bEA0RDVxzwD56JurbCIclXz/1qVFV4c
Cancel-Lock: sha1:53kPxZzJS62pR0dHSwoTlv9n8ic=
In-Reply-To: <a95dff26-3c75-4386-af45-60a2187f153bo@googlegroups.com>
Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.javascript:38876

Julio Di Egidio:

> On Thursday, 24 September 2020 20:44:11 UTC+2, Arno Welzel  wrote:
>> Julio Di Egidio:
>>
>>> On Thursday, 24 September 2020 19:35:02 UTC+2, Arno Welzel  wrote:
>>>> On 20.09.20 11:42, Julio Di Egidio wrote:
>>>>> On Sunday, 20 September 2020 11:26:27 UTC+2, Arno Welzel  wrote:
>>>>>> Andrew Poulos:
>>>>>
>>>>>>> In index.js I have: import { ...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Why do you import a module within another module? The idea is to have a
>>>>>> script and one or more modules - but not modules importing other modules.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Also see:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> <https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/JavaScript/Guide/Modules>
>>>>>
>>>>> What are you even talking about?
>>>>>
>>>>>   <script type="module" src="main.js"></script>
>>>>>
>>>>> Notice that only a module can import from a module...
>>>>
>>>> I stand corrected. Of course you're right. Also see:
>>>>
>>>> <https://github.com/mdn/js-examples/tree/master/modules/basic-modules>
>>>
>>> Why should anyone see yet another example, and one about
>>> just using modules, which, as already pointed out, is not
>>> even the question that was asked?  --  Never mind.
>>>
>>> *Plonk*
>>
>> You don't even know, what "*Plonk*" means, do you?
> 
> I do, it's you who are yet another example of
> Dunning-Kruger augmented by an absolute lack of
> integrity, intellectual and probably otherwise.
> Congratulations, idiot.
> 
> *Plonk*

I think you are a good example for Dunning-Kruger.


-- 
Arno Welzel
https://arnowelzel.de