Path: csiph.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail
From: Arno Welzel <usenet@arnowelzel.de>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.javascript
Subject: Re: Comparisson with a list arguments.
Date: Tue, 12 Nov 2019 12:13:14 +0100
Lines: 27
Message-ID: <h2vieaFondnU1@mid.individual.net>
References: <c1300623-8fa6-483c-819a-6627d20c444d@googlegroups.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Trace: individual.net pRAcgbbFk9rCl3DEOdAGlAI63lRPnzHUK+WW091JGJ9CVtw6p0
Cancel-Lock: sha1:G6Hb8Uta3QOKWqDNVwsd1Wa2+aI=
In-Reply-To: <c1300623-8fa6-483c-819a-6627d20c444d@googlegroups.com>
Content-Language: en-US
Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.javascript:37756

On 08.11.19 09:07, Jonas Thörnvall wrote:
> It would be handy to be able to have a list of arguments to compare
> with, of course one could store the values in an array use a loop to
> scroll thru.
> 
> But something like this would be easier to use.
> 
> if (track[editTrack].midiMess[i].data0 == ("224" || "112" || "128"))
> 
> 
> One can wonder why the most obvious solustions never implemented? I
> think it is weird, i just don't get it....

It is:

<https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/JavaScript/Reference/Global_Objects/Array/includes>

> And then you end up with a string that is hardly readable, or the
> need to read in the values into an array. It is just weird, do you
> guys never favour readability of code?

Who is "you guys"? You have to ask the people maintaining ECMAScript.


-- 
Arno Welzel
https://arnowelzel.de