Path: csiph.com!weretis.net!feeder7.news.weretis.net!news.szaf.org!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail
From: Arno Welzel <usenet@arnowelzel.de>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.javascript
Subject: Re: Lazy programmers guide to blizz
Date: Fri, 1 Nov 2019 11:04:10 +0100
Lines: 41
Message-ID: <h22e8qFlomcU1@mid.individual.net>
References: <a5e610b3-f5ee-4d80-a085-0d9300fa5e1d@googlegroups.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Trace: individual.net 2OZZne+cjaNRs3farnPVMwGjbibqCICVKjaR6f2hzBplZfmQxk
Cancel-Lock: sha1:6ToR1APuXy9AlxYC9tMgzRkw2UU=
In-Reply-To: <a5e610b3-f5ee-4d80-a085-0d9300fa5e1d@googlegroups.com>
Content-Language: en-US
Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.javascript:37659

On 01.11.19 08:50, Jonas Thörnvall wrote:
> It so boring writing if intervals using < > or > <
> And hard to read
> Why not simplify 
> 
> if(A inside.interval(144-159))
> if (A outside.interval(144-159))
> 
> Maybe there already is interval functions in javascript?
> 
> Alteratively for the operator fixated
> if   (144< A <159)
> if   (144> A >159)

Hmmm...


    A inside.interval(144-159)

vs.

    A >= 144 && A <= 160

And you find the first one really simpler? I don't.

For example: does inside.interval() mean ">=" and "<=" or ">" and "<"?
This is not clear when looking at the code.

But if you prefer this, just create your own function - assuming, that
the interval means including the lower and upper limit:

function between(x, min, max) {
  return x >= min && x <= max;
}




-- 
Arno Welzel
https://arnowelzel.de