Path: csiph.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail From: Arno Welzel Newsgroups: comp.lang.javascript Subject: Re: Where can I find a summary table of various reqular expressions options? Date: Tue, 30 Jul 2019 11:46:25 +0200 Lines: 37 Message-ID: References: <562cba23.0404060528.4d36d9c9@posting.google.com> <876a8475-9646-4284-a93a-3b24e752372f@googlegroups.com> <3019391.44csPzL39Z@PointedEars.de> <7mc8jetiace45ukm7f74c9ot0n45rqdiop@4ax.com> <3cvtjedfi4iam79uhspdrubepggnu62n1l@4ax.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: individual.net N81XvA1qMQ3TzQqEEwAavwxj1TRot0iettbdP0SI06DVYgvOfs Cancel-Lock: sha1:0CoyNOl2cShwy2Zn/MB4mqeV9MI= In-Reply-To: <3cvtjedfi4iam79uhspdrubepggnu62n1l@4ax.com> Content-Language: en-US Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.javascript:37004 On 29.07.19 16:08, John G Harris wrote: > On Sun, 28 Jul 2019 15:36:27 +0200, Arno Welzel > wrote: > >> John G Harris: >> >>> On Sun, 21 Jul 2019 04:24:43 +0200, Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn >>> wrote: >>> >>>> Michael Haufe (TNO) wrote: >>>> >>>>> On Tuesday, April 6, 2004 at 8:28:19 AM UTC-5, Anonieko Ramos wrote: >>>> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^ >>>>>> [full quote] >>> >>> Another lie by Thomas >> >> What lie? Thomas just cited *another* post which had this introduction. > > The expression [full quote] does not appear anywhere in Michael's > article nor in the article Michael quotes, so which article is Thomas > supposedly citing? Is it his own article? An article in a different > thread? Next week's article? We should be told. "[full quote]" is a placeholder for the full quote which was found there. Maybe he could use "[full quote removed]" to make it more clear, that there was a full quote which he removed. But I wouldn't call this "lie" because a lie is to pretend something which isn't true. Do you really think, the intention was to make us believe, that Anonieko Ramos wrote "[full quote]" in exactly this way? -- Arno Welzel https://arnowelzel.de