Path: csiph.com!usenet.pasdenom.info!news.albasani.net!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Dr J R Stockton Newsgroups: comp.lang.javascript Subject: Re: JSFAQ.org, Hosting and Contributors. Date: Thu, 7 Nov 2013 16:53:18 +0000 Organization: Home Lines: 57 Message-ID: References: <0d01daee-7e1b-4d7d-8c07-72c326b96d8b@googlegroups.com> <52746391-8843-470d-87eb-8e1a047c2121@googlegroups.com> <588259be-d375-43db-91aa-c6f658ad5625@googlegroups.com> <526f2152$0$6558$9b4e6d93@newsspool4.arcor-online.net> <5974547d-0c8f-4083-98e2-412b44a9e018@googlegroups.com> <3316232.tN5FpDIeGy@PointedEars.de> <46942ffa-1a7a-46f3-92a7-8dc5ade0b596@googlegroups.com> <1809326.V1qVYlCJvj@PointedEars.de> <1383549540.TNsZB9pSnc@PointedEars.de> <1589111.ZGqaern48i@PointedEars.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Info: mx05.eternal-september.org; posting-host="01da9e6251d9b3ee47bb70bebae42d53"; logging-data="22791"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/GEwc/xTgf1QGyTm3XZTf73qMABWpQvuY=" User-Agent: Turnpike/6.05-S () Cancel-Lock: sha1:vVd/EAc5wit8v6JYVFjKkI0YUMY= Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.javascript:21927 In comp.lang.javascript message <1589111.ZGqaern48i@PointedEars.de>, Wed, 6 Nov 2013 01:12:14, Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn posted: >Dr J R Stockton wrote: > >[snipped attribution novel] > >> […] Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn […] posted: >>> There are better ways to resolve this that I am going to investigate, and >>> will implement for the FAQ for comp.lang.javascript if and when I am sure >>> that they cannot and will not be abused in order to steal intellectual >>> property, or, in general, to use it only for one's own benefit. >> >> You have no right to write or edit a FAQ for comp.lang.javascript, since >> you have not been generally agreed by the users of comp.lang.javascript > >And I presume you presume to be someone who can forbid me that which you >have done yourself. I have neither written nor edited a FAQ for comp.lang.javascript. >> to be anything like a suitable person. > >For that matter, nobody has agreed that you are anything like a suitable >person either. How dare you to have a copy of the original FAQ at your >site, then? Nobody (perhaps), including me (certainly). The copy on my site is manifestly a copy - it does not even contain, AFAIR, my name. The only link to it from my site has an explicit statement that it is a copy. >> The first hurdle, at which you have fallen, is to be manifestly usually >> amiable. > >You appear to be under the illusion that you and your opinion are still held >here in high regard. > >> You can write a JavaScript FAQ of your own, but that will need to stand >> or fall by its own merits, if any. > >No, it will not have to. You have neither been paying attention nor have >you cared to read carefully the posting you have replied to. I *never* care to read your material. But sometimes I do read it. Your understanding of English is not as good as you think it is. Please do not post when you are in a bad temper. -- (c) John Stockton, nr London UK Reply address via Merlyn Home Page. news:comp.lang.javascript FAQ . jscr maths, dates, sources. TP/BP/Delphi/jscr/&c, FAQ items, links.