Path: csiph.com!usenet.pasdenom.info!gegeweb.org!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!news.swapon.de!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail
From: "Mel Smith" <syntel@cox.net>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.javascript
Subject: Re: onclick and <a> tag question
Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2015 12:29:02 -0700
Lines: 12
Message-ID: <cn0mc3F1gufU1@mid.individual.net>
References: <cmugv0Fep3qU1@mid.individual.net> <2047696.ZRK4UxyjuH@PointedEars.de> <cn09pjFsj2vU1@mid.individual.net> <mef12f$1g8$1@solani.org>
X-Trace: individual.net ZY0EZARdBLK+MMlFYQNw8gkJuu2LTM/fa49nGbzupL8SkuYqwJ
Cancel-Lock: sha1:g6DKjWh2xOjfiM77dSxpMqi4x08=
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.5931
X-RFC2646: Format=Flowed; Original
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.6157
Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.javascript:27083

Christoph said:
> Well, it pretty much appears that those "abusers" are actually download
> managers.  If the web server is able to deliver partial content, I
> wouldn't worry about those, because they won't increase the overall
> bandwidth considerably.


But it still bugs me !

-Mel