X-Received: by 10.99.157.193 with SMTP id i184mr4426191pgd.78.1482012343093; Sat, 17 Dec 2016 14:05:43 -0800 (PST)
X-Received: by 10.157.18.211 with SMTP id g77mr539859otg.14.1482012343050; Sat, 17 Dec 2016 14:05:43 -0800 (PST)
Path: csiph.com!feeder.erje.net!2.us.feeder.erje.net!news.glorb.com!b123no1164457itb.0!news-out.google.com!c1ni20679itd.0!nntp.google.com!b123no1164446itb.0!postnews.google.com!glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: comp.lang.javascript
Date: Sat, 17 Dec 2016 14:05:42 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <ibVhj2Ufp$5XFw7a@invalid.uk.co.demon.merlyn.invalid>
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com; posting-host=2602:306:cd7d:c1a0:d820:a13f:f318:6c7a; posting-account=hYRygAoAAABkmvJVmPilz9Q1TOjgPQAq
NNTP-Posting-Host: 2602:306:cd7d:c1a0:d820:a13f:f318:6c7a
References: <e9YO6R5rMS5XFwOp@invalid.uk.co.demon.merlyn.invalid> <XnsA68D6BFADE8eejj99@194.109.6.166> <ibVhj2Ufp$5XFw7a@invalid.uk.co.demon.merlyn.invalid>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <bf96a445-506f-49ea-96aa-cb2839df8efc@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: TypeScript
From: "Michael Haufe (TNO)" <tno@thenewobjective.com>
Injection-Date: Sat, 17 Dec 2016 22:05:43 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.javascript:31889

On Sunday, September 25, 2016 at 4:58:47 PM UTC-5, Dr J R Stockton wrote:
> In comp.lang.javascript message <XnsA68D6BFADE8eejj99@194.109.6.166>,
> Sat, 24 Sep 2016 10:36:53, Evertjan.
> posted:
> 
> >Dr J R Stockton wrote on 23 Sep 2016
> >in comp.lang.javascript:
> >
> >> Has there been anything about TypeScript in this newsgroup?
> >
> ><https://groups.google.com/forum/#!
> >topicsearchin/comp.lang.javascript/typescript>
> 
> Most of those are unrealistically old : I think many of the hits are
> finds of "type script".
> 
> The obvious question is "Is the TypeScript system actually everywhere
> compliant with the ECMA-262 standards?".

Yes. TypeScript is a strict superset of ECMASCript