Path: csiph.com!v102.xanadu-bbs.net!xanadu-bbs.net!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!mx04.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: JJ <jaejunks@nah.meh>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.javascript
Subject: Re: Source code "objectifying" technique?
Date: Fri, 4 Jan 2013 02:00:17 +0000 (UTC)
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 17
Message-ID: <XnsA13E5C583F660jj@0.0.0.55>
References: <XnsA13DB38A51C6jj@0.0.0.55> <kc4ir7$bh7$1@news.albasani.net> <XnsA13E219E61C5Ejj@0.0.0.55> <kc52d9$dau$1@news.albasani.net>
Injection-Date: Fri, 4 Jan 2013 02:00:17 +0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: mx04.eternal-september.org; posting-host="f8ea35d8958493b8650c0b3ef1b6a34b"; logging-data="7949"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX192QueNfIsp7Wgix8FGE/j0AqNun8/iR6M="
User-Agent: Xnews/5.04.25
X-Face: \*\`0(1j~VfYC>ebz[&O.]=,Nm\oRM{of,liRO#7Eqi4|!]!(Gs=Akgh{J)605>C9Air?pad{sSZ09u+A7f<^paR"/NH_#<mE1S"hde\c6PZLUB[t/s5-+Iu5DSc?P0+4%,Hl
Cancel-Lock: sha1:jPsW+zDQ9DgFCKFLOTxtIWCbmzE=
Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.javascript:17933

Stefan Weiss <krewecherl@gmail.com> wrote:
> Bound as in Function.prototype.bind? Maybe. Off the top of my head, I
> can't think of how that would cause problems, if what the functions are
> bound to is also in the scope of the anonymous closure.
> I was thinking more of libraries directly setting properties on the
> global object, or missing variable declarations.

Yes, including "call" and "apply". OK. Maybe I'm just too worried.

> Conversion #1[edited] has the potential to cause problems in JScript, 
because of
> the braindead way IE handles named function expressions:
> 
> http://kangax.github.com/nfe/#jscript-bugs

Didn't know that, and that it can cause many problems. I'll keep that for 
reference, thanks.