Path: csiph.com!usenet.pasdenom.info!aioe.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Mike Duffy Newsgroups: comp.lang.javascript Subject: Re: onkeydown and onkeyup Date: Fri, 23 Mar 2012 01:44:32 +0000 (UTC) Organization: Your Company Lines: 21 Message-ID: References: <2eu2m718r5tn1jp7uah2dsv3aa8gj3gi6q@4ax.com> <97a3ca53-f073-4409-abb1-da50fb5cdd2a@a20g2000yql.googlegroups.com> <9sp6n1Fqr9U1@mid.individual.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: 8GXtu24jXTHJm9OLlhLTEQ.user.speranza.aioe.org X-Complaints-To: abuse@aioe.org User-Agent: Xnews/5.04.25 X-Notice: Filtered by postfilter v. 0.8.2 Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.javascript:13004 Tim Streater wrote in news:timstreater-ED8825.19192322032012@news.individual.net: > In article , > "Evertjan." wrote: >> I think it has to. In any case, "stomped", used this way, is not >> mainline English in my English world, it must be your local slang. Or >> it might be that your English is not as standard as you think it is? > > Mmmm no, not the case actually. I agree its a relatively unusual word, > less likely perhaps to be seen on Usenet, but definitely common to > both sides of the pond (with the same meaning, near as I can tell). Ask Dr. Stockton. Usually he has an opinion regarding English word usage. I cannot ask him because I think he put me in his bozo bin some time back. -- http://pages.videotron.ca/duffym/index.htm