Path: csiph.com!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.javascript
Subject: Re: Sort at least 5 times faster then native and quicksort
Date: Sun, 29 Oct 2017 14:50:57 +0000
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 21
Message-ID: <87ineyt3ce.fsf@bsb.me.uk>
References: <8c8816a1-0e4f-4bb4-8a52-94f434e4d599@googlegroups.com> <87d156upbm.fsf@bsb.me.uk> <e577e87c-3ed9-47f8-a5a6-0262ef58409c@googlegroups.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Info: reader02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="b252f5705e435813dbfff633d4cae81b"; logging-data="9422"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+z1XFXBREHbcL/cQYmZ5Zp+wR/AdBTQ/4="
Cancel-Lock: sha1:ZH/X3R/5HmSRkvy7p4MhW3bjpBo= sha1:hkL+Azjrr7ZzxeqMowsEF/14ToM=
Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.javascript:34237

jonas.thornvall@gmail.com writes:

> Den söndag 29 oktober 2017 kl. 13:10:59 UTC+1 skrev Ben Bacarisse:
>> jonas.thornvall@gmail.com writes:
>> 
>> > My sort Algorithm is at least 5 time faster then native and quicks
>> > sort for densely populated samples "where numbers have 1 or more
>> > occurences".
>> 
>> It's not really your algorithm, it's your implementation of a well-known
>> algorithm.
<snip>
> Well i can agree it is funny "although albeit a bit worrying" when the
> strawmans approaches tend to be so much faster then the experts LoL

Who are you agreeing with?  Did someone say it was funny.  If you don't
know what the experts know, of course you might think it's something
new.  That's not worrying for the experts.

-- 
Ben.