Path: csiph.com!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.javascript
Subject: Re: Voting on a site
Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2018 23:01:48 +0000
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 24
Message-ID: <87in0qavc3.fsf@bsb.me.uk>
References: <01f72933-e7af-4b36-b561-4061694191e3@googlegroups.com> <87r2fed4z4.fsf@bsb.me.uk> <XnsA9A1E44617ED3eejj99@194.109.6.166>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Injection-Info: reader01.eternal-september.org; posting-host="b670025677fe13092894e2144f27e3f9"; logging-data="11868"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18c566xlUA3ok6gY9FVzqOvty7rDlLYzuk="
Cancel-Lock: sha1:0w3CYWIeklxRfHnPd/wXR6pAcBI= sha1:/jjNWo/rJ3FF2d2Z8/VYMudsGkU=
X-BSB-Auth: 1.88f8bd4bea0a5acfa005.20181121230148GMT.87in0qavc3.fsf@bsb.me.uk
Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.javascript:35847

"Evertjan." <exxjxw.hannivoort@inter.nl.net> writes:

> Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> wrote on 21 Nov 2018 in 
> comp.lang.javascript:
>
>> This is not going to be a client-side scripting issue so you'll need to
>> move the question elsewhere to get the best answers.
>
> While this is a good answer, it is not perfect.
>
> c.l.j. is not a group dedicated to *clientside* Javascript only,
> and it is quite possible and even convenient to use Javascript
> serverside.

Yup, good point.  However the problems that need to be addressed are
independent of the server-side language, and I think people on other
groups are more inclined to discuss them.  Having sorted out the design
the OP could come back here for language advice.

Or do you plan to help with some server-side Javascript proposals?

<snip>
-- 
Ben.