Path: csiph.com!v102.xanadu-bbs.net!xanadu-bbs.net!feeder.erje.net!eu.feeder.erje.net!eweka.nl!lightspeed.eweka.nl!193.141.40.65.MISMATCH!npeer.de.kpn-eurorings.net!npeer-ng0.de.kpn-eurorings.net!newsfeed.arcor.de!newsspool3.arcor-online.net!news.arcor.de.POSTED!not-for-mail Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Message-ID: <8440335.Is0bzsB635@PointedEars.de> From: Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn Reply-To: Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn Organization: PointedEars Software (PES) Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2013 22:26:40 +0100 User-Agent: KNode/4.10.5 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8Bit X-Face: %i>XG-yXR'\"2P/C_aO%~;2o~?g0pPKmbOw^=NT`tprDEf++D.m7"}HW6.#=U:?2GGctkL,f89@H46O$ASoW&?s}.k+&. <5YOdnSt8q6e2O-3PnZ2dnUVZ_tOdnZ2d@westnet.com.au> MIME-Version: 1.0 Lines: 41 NNTP-Posting-Date: 31 Oct 2013 22:26:44 CET NNTP-Posting-Host: 789ad3d8.newsspool4.arcor-online.net X-Trace: DXC=eMk2ARIoFA0^cW`WBF>WQ<4IUKFBLffSJ< X-Complaints-To: usenet-abuse@arcor.de Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.javascript:21807 Andrew Poulos wrote: > On 1/11/2013 5:52 AM, dhtml wrote: >> On Tuesday, October 29, 2013 11:24:04 PM UTC-7, Andrew Poulos wrote: >>> On 30/10/2013 1:44 PM, dhtml wrote: >>>> How can I filter out PointedEars' messages in Google Groups UI? >>> You're openly willing to steal his work but not read his messages. >>> It >> >> I wanted to bring him on the project. I got an impolite email reply >> so I thought about it. >> >> But I wanted to use his contributions on the project and posted so on >> the list. That isn't stealing; it's standard fare for open source >> projects. But after his nasty reply, no way. > > I now fully agree with Stockton's assessment of you. JFTR: The so-called “impolite email reply” merely pointed out to the person Cc:ing me their Usenet posting without further comment that 1. A previous attempt at doing a cljs FAQ at GitHub had failed, and that I think this was because of a break of medium that the person suggesting the same was not aware of. 2. We had agreed on a different course of action almost a year ago, and the results of that agreement must have been carelessly neglected in order to explain the person's current approach. 3. It does not help one's reputation to post off-topic. 4. I do not usually read Google Groups postings, as I have explained many times before, and I do not wish to be Cc:'d, as it says in my sig. If necessary, I can post that e-mail here. -- PointedEars Twitter: @PointedEars2 Please do not Cc: me. / Bitte keine Kopien per E-Mail.