X-Received: by 10.180.189.74 with SMTP id gg10mr4152724wic.4.1369692049656; Mon, 27 May 2013 15:00:49 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <7684548.plq7IPHa5s@PointedEars.de> From: Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn Reply-To: Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn Organization: PointedEars Software (PES) Date: Tue, 28 May 2013 00:00:47 +0200 User-Agent: KNode/4.10.2 X-Face: %i>XG-yXR'\"2P/C_aO%~;2o~?g0pPKmbOw^=NT`tprDEf++D.m7"}HW6.#=U:?2GGctkL,f89@H46O$ASoW&?s}.k+&. <10408762.JzxCSuINyj@PointedEars.de> <28567346.elAEKrzd9Y@PointedEars.de> <1886046.z6t1GHbE6s@PointedEars.de> <1614253.6SbFCPW3aX@PointedEars.de> <1678891.pDxAfIlnAs@PointedEars.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Lines: 26 NNTP-Posting-Date: 28 May 2013 00:00:48 CEST NNTP-Posting-Host: 1091ce6d.newsspool4.arcor-online.net X-Trace: DXC=L1PmefbSIL3]E=H1Q9`7874IUKDZm8W4\YJN On 27/05/2013 16:10, Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn wrote: >> Joao Rodrigues wrote: > > [libel] > >>> Therefore, going back to the OP's code, I cannot see any reason to not >>> test for window.pageYOffset before testing for the MSIE proprietary >>> scrollTop. >> >> The thing that you apparently are unable to understand is that *both* >> properties are nothing but proprietary as of now. > > That pageYOffset is proprietary?!?! Now you're delusional. “Multiple exclamation marks,” he went on, shaking his head, “are a sure sign of a diseased mind.” ─Terry Pratchett, “Eric” -- PointedEars Twitter: @PointedEars2 Please do not Cc: me. / Bitte keine Kopien per E-Mail.