Path: csiph.com!aioe.org!news.mb-net.net!open-news-network.org!.POSTED.75.236.197.178.dynamic.wless.lssmb00p-cgnat.res.cust.swisscom.ch!not-for-mail
From: Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.javascript
Subject: Re: Inserting stuff received with AJAX into the DOM
Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2017 16:44:13 +0200
Organization: PointedEars Software (PES)
Lines: 31
Message-ID: <6718455.EvYhyI6sBW@PointedEars.de>
References: <7e54d58e-0ce6-4bb5-9f07-f65b69a94a64@googlegroups.com> <5846bd55-f0bd-4088-a596-aba50eef32a5@googlegroups.com> <DOM-insertation-20170819210612@ram.dialup.fu-berlin.de> <11843581.uLZWGnKmhe@PointedEars.de> <onc4cc$2mkt$1@csiph.com> <7340100.T7Z3S40VBb@PointedEars.de> <oncp61$2o9$1@csiph.com> <19530051.EfDdHjke4D@PointedEars.de> <ondujg$rus$1@csiph.com>
Reply-To: Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <cljs@PointedEars.de>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8Bit
Injection-Info: gwaiyur.mb-net.net; posting-host="75.236.197.178.dynamic.wless.lssmb00p-cgnat.res.cust.swisscom.ch:178.197.236.75"; logging-data="13685"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@open-news-network.org"
User-Agent: KNode/4.14.2
X-User-ID: U2FsdGVkX189Lt0nhipPy23cHtaecnHRq5QvV7dzl05whN2wRlksbg==
Cancel-Lock: sha1:DiOBaOib8iLUygOHKLnEjikDiKs=
Face: iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAADAAAAAwBAMAAAClLOS0AAAAGFBMVEXTxa4RFk5dUWANED8PFEfy7+MGBiW+n3ZNF/QuAAACaElEQVQ4jVXUwVOcMBQG8Dc7Rc4PUntdWV2uxjDpGaGeozOp1woar4jd5t/v9wLstMwsA/ntlxdCAgUc1hjTc9/JCZfGoo3wG3HdmdAWrIJRHe7GM/TmpY5VFefuVcAkkPbLIaN8rmPmjloyZxgyR3GuJ4K0AGtJ2htz8o7yqikm759fldQXaMpbDzjKAG+8v+AugVTOPO5DOjLvGtUYQwh0CPjnVMyGd+8/GfUB5nLKJDD2aLDh5HYyMDJGDwQIo2ZmZcKbowNmAdB/AzyFhrmF2MHRb0QJJfaAnwGB6orZhoykLzJtGwF/xpYxI1dswomiUj3gTuAIqCn/4C7cULwGNBtwMTk3Y4LfKB5YUaOKBKYtpplm7u0vip8tU1NWWyI/7XdcSuIDoMt6rVHMWT0DbjHPGqDqZVSa6zleLcUTcIKLoMv3ueJluALtAo9B302zPPlrtiVScRdCjXvVh3e3JpYa/jjkuC9N+LrBMlz/eAN4eQijX2EdLo6c5tGGHwLyHFtXk89dDGHwCVhG9T0S/j55AhRZgkMCmUQXJ49TnS1wnQDvw0eAh9ICeMmEFbCnPMFzjAvsWoEWEFdYEx+S0MoUZ1gT1wId8+AF3Bl2OoEu906AUHx5VLw/gXYg/x84loOah/2UYNrgiwSwGO7RfUzVBbx/kgpckumGOi6QirtD6gkLTitbnxNol47S2jVc2vsN5kPqaAHT8uUdAJM4v/DanjYOwmUjWznGfwB7sGtAtor5BgofDuzaRj4kSQAqDakTsKORa3Q3xKi3gE1fhl71KRMqrdZ2AWNNg/YOhQyrVBnb+i+nEg4bsDA+egAAAABJRU5ErkJggg==
X-Face: %i>XG-yXR'\"2P/C_aO%~;2o~?g0pPKmbOw^=NT`tprDEf++D.m7"}HW6.#=U:?2GGctkL,f89@H46O$ASoW&?s}.k+&.<b';Md8`dH6iqhT)6C^.Px|[=M@7=Ik[_w<%n1Up"LPQNu2m8|L!/3iby{-]A+#YE}Kl{Cw$\U!kD%K}\2jz"QQP6Uqr],./"?;=4v
Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.javascript:33846

Cezary Tomczyk wrote:

> On 20/08/2017 22:39, Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn wrote:
>> Cezary Tomczyk wrote:
>>> On 20/08/2017 19:18, Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn wrote:
>>>> Cezary Tomczyk wrote:
>>>>> "par" is always defined, […]
>>>> How did you get that idea?
>>> const par = document.createElement( 'p' );
>> And you are sure that the method that is called on the right-hand side of
>> that assignment cannot possibly return something else than a reference to
>> an object that has a method named “appendChild”?
> 
> I am sure that:
> 
> const par = document.createElement( 'p' );
> 
> will always create HTML element. I can't see any real scenario where
> createElement method will return "something else than a reference to an
> object that has a method named “appendChild”" in that particular scenario.

Why?
 
> Correct me, if I am wrong.

Nice try :)
 
-- 
PointedEars
FAQ: <http://PointedEars.de/faq> | <http://PointedEars.de/es-matrix>
<https://github.com/PointedEars> | <http://PointedEars.de/wsvn/>
Twitter: @PointedEars2 | Please do not cc me./Bitte keine Kopien per E-Mail.