Path: csiph.com!usenet.pasdenom.info!weretis.net!feeder4.news.weretis.net!news.teledata-fn.de!newsfeed.arcor.de!newsspool4.arcor-online.net!news.arcor.de.POSTED!not-for-mail Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Message-ID: <5704512.9vG1sJhrMg@PointedEars.de> From: Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn Reply-To: Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn Organization: PointedEars Software (PES) Date: Mon, 18 Nov 2013 14:49:39 +0100 User-Agent: KNode/4.10.5 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8Bit X-Face: %i>XG-yXR'\"2P/C_aO%~;2o~?g0pPKmbOw^=NT`tprDEf++D.m7"}HW6.#=U:?2GGctkL,f89@H46O$ASoW&?s}.k+&. <1b1b429d-fea6-4e5e-86bb-0edf9f551de5@googlegroups.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Lines: 67 NNTP-Posting-Date: 18 Nov 2013 14:49:40 CET NNTP-Posting-Host: 62a76ee4.newsspool2.arcor-online.net X-Trace: DXC==;IXB?C8Ek;T2Rfi6em@_^^WH3I2 X-Complaints-To: usenet-abuse@arcor.de Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.javascript:22041 Salvatore DI DIO wrote: > Hello Thomas, This is a newsgroup, not an Internet chat. > Thank you very much for your arguments. > > You wrote : > > "...Please do not attempt to write translators before you have a fair > knowledge about what you are translating into (and from).... > > - I am not the genius creator of RapydScript. I don't care; and as for “genius”, that remains to be seen. > - RapydScript is by no means a direct translation Python -> Javascript. So far I consider it junk. Prove me wrong. > See for example this valid syntax in RapydScript : > > (def greet(name = "Paul"): > alert(name) > )() > > This has nothing to do with Python syntax, isn't it ? I don't care. You have claimed that it could be used to “translate” Python to “Javascript”, whatever you think the latter is. > You have to think of RapydScript as a mean to faciltate Javascript > programming. I have to think of RapydScript as a program written by people who do not know ECMAScript for people who do not know ECMAScript, like yourself, by now. > It transparently uses any existant libraries. You do not appear to have the slightest clue what you are talking about. > It's scope is ablolutely not to implement Python syntax, that is the scope > of Brython I don't care. The ECMAScript code produced by it is not equivalent, therefore useless. One can write better ECMAScript code without it. > Go to the official site and see how RapydScript is implemented and why. You have failed to give me sufficient incentive to do that. > In case of you don't want to go to the main site, you can read the copy of > the main page, below > […] > [100+ lines of spam] Apparently you have much to learn. -- PointedEars Twitter: @PointedEars2 Please do not Cc: me. / Bitte keine Kopien per E-Mail.