Path: csiph.com!v102.xanadu-bbs.net!xanadu-bbs.net!feeder.erje.net!eu.feeder.erje.net!newsreader4.netcologne.de!news.netcologne.de!takemy.news.telefonica.de!telefonica.de!newsfeed.arcor.de!newsspool4.arcor-online.net!news.arcor.de.POSTED!not-for-mail
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Message-ID: <4391000.0xoOKoflbG@PointedEars.de>
From: Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de>
Reply-To: Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <cljs@PointedEars.de>
Organization: PointedEars Software (PES)
Date: Mon, 11 Nov 2013 20:21:46 +0100
User-Agent: KNode/4.10.5
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8Bit
X-Face: %i>XG-yXR'\"2P/C_aO%~;2o~?g0pPKmbOw^=NT`tprDEf++D.m7"}HW6.#=U:?2GGctkL,f89@H46O$ASoW&?s}.k+&.<b';Md8`dH6iqhT)6C^.Px|[=M@7=Ik[_w<%n1Up"LPQNu2m8|L!/3iby{-]A+#YE}Kl{Cw$\U!kD%K}\2jz"QQP6Uqr],./"?;=4v
Face: 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
Subject: Re: Is it possible to pop up windows in node.js?
Newsgroups: comp.lang.javascript
References: <d1a010fc-4554-4677-ad22-b8351e7e24e2@googlegroups.com> <711754ff-1c48-4377-a327-3d5c4b49fad9@googlegroups.com> <7844568.JiaYqQEp0h@PointedEars.de> <bc18d773-6749-49e9-890d-8dd0b76cf6f3@googlegroups.com> <1778804.q0Nx8XmBib@PointedEars.de> <00cf7530-882a-4016-b511-4518f5cf9278@googlegroups.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Lines: 50
NNTP-Posting-Date: 11 Nov 2013 20:21:49 CET
NNTP-Posting-Host: ffc13f7e.newsspool2.arcor-online.net
X-Trace: DXC=jV2V63d246L=8m7nZkdN^@A9EHlD;3YcB4Fo<]lROoRA8kF<OcfhCOKL9HoAM`Ej_ODZm8W4\YJNLYUVHKH;GI^G\>@[hLNg?mIYBTSgEimHbD
X-Complaints-To: usenet-abuse@arcor.de
Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.javascript:21965

Michael Haufe (TNO) wrote:

> Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn wrote:
>> Because I expected something simple like this, I had emphasized *in*. 
>> This is not popping up a window *in* node.js, it is popping up one *with
>> the help of* node.js.
> 
> That's like saying using "window.alert" or "WScript.Echo" is not popping
> up a window *in* JS, but *with the help of* JS.

Apples and oranges.  node.js in this case merely generates code that is 
executed somewhere else.

> This is a tedious detail

No, it is not.

> which is elided as it does not advance or answer the main question in a
> meaningful way.

IYHO.

> Additionally, I'm relatively certain the OP used the word "in" to mean "in
> the context of".

I am 99.2% certain the OP has not the slightest clue what they are talking 
about.  Insofar, barring a server-side API for node.js to pop up windows, it 
would be better to educate them as to server-side and client-side code.

> So if he/she hasn't been scared off by the meta-discussion, we might get a
> follow-up.

There you go again.  If you can't stand the heat, stay out of the kitchen.
 
>> ACK.  It is, however, not enough to justify your “yes”.
> 
> Pretty sure I said "the quick answer is yes"

Whereas IMHO the “quick answer” therefore must be “no”.
 
> Do you have a more constructive answer towards the original question?

Not having dealt with node.js yet, and not being in the habit of helping 
anonymous Google lusers, no.

-- 
PointedEars

Twitter: @PointedEars2
Please do not Cc: me. / Bitte keine Kopien per E-Mail.