Path: csiph.com!usenet.pasdenom.info!weretis.net!feeder4.news.weretis.net!newsfeed.straub-nv.de!noris.net!newsfeed.arcor.de!newsspool4.arcor-online.net!news.arcor.de.POSTED!not-for-mail Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Message-ID: <3703984.pIQAaQtanI@PointedEars.de> From: Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn Reply-To: Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn Organization: PointedEars Software (PES) Date: Wed, 19 Dec 2012 18:10:01 +0100 User-Agent: KNode/4.4.11 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit X-Face: %i>XG-yXR'\"2P/C_aO%~;2o~?g0pPKmbOw^=NT`tprDEf++D.m7"}HW6.#=U:?2GGctkL,f89@H46O$ASoW&?s}.k+&. <1868da91-d142-49ee-8b09-27c0983c1af4@a2g2000yqh.googlegroups.com> <1463892.vp2pE7osQE@PointedEars.de> <2715826.m0UDekTA75@PointedEars.de> <15797403.gaI5B2VX2m@PointedEars.de> <1820492.ZBGHdalzjF@PointedEars.de> Followup-To: comp.lang.javascript MIME-Version: 1.0 Lines: 48 NNTP-Posting-Date: 19 Dec 2012 18:10:02 CET NNTP-Posting-Host: f85c19d5.newsspool2.arcor-online.net X-Trace: DXC=M73f2[K?2=U5TOT9_N5i Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn wrote: >> Scott Sauyet wrote: >>> I'm not sure whether I would want to debate that point or not. But >>> the main goal from my point of view is to have a maintainable FAQ. >>> I'm willing to break with the existing infrastructure if doing so will >>> make this goal easier. >> >> A fundamental misconception. Breaking with an existing infrastructure >> can by definition only make an implementation task *harder* because you >> will also have to build your own, new infrastructure then. That does not >> mean that the end result could not be *better*. But it requires more >> effort than building on something that already exists. As a result, it >> requires more man-hours to become at least adequate to what is intended >> to be replaced. > > Nonsense. Writing a tool that automates a tedious manual job breaks > existing infrastructure. I have no idea what you are talking about. Have you? > But it does not make the overall task harder. > To be sure, the initial investment will take some time to pay > back, but there can be a net gain from this. Are you reading what I wrote? I was referring to the *implementation* task. > My contention is that having multiple documents in a plain-text format > such as Markdown will make for an easier to maintain FAQ than having a > single XML document containing the entire contents. I have already explained that it does not have to be that way with XML. Why are you insisting on the false dichotomy? > I also believe that with this technique an auto-poster will be easier > to maintain when necessary. Perhaps. Perhaps not. It will be easier to *post* the content if the content is already in a format that is *acceptable* for posting. PointedEars -- Sometimes, what you learn is wrong. If those wrong ideas are close to the root of the knowledge tree you build on a particular subject, pruning the bad branches can sometimes cause the whole tree to collapse. -- Mike Duffy in cljs,