Path: csiph.com!v102.xanadu-bbs.net!xanadu-bbs.net!us.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!eu.feeder.erje.net!newsfeed.datemas.de!weretis.net!feeder4.news.weretis.net!news.teledata-fn.de!newsfeed.arcor.de!newsspool3.arcor-online.net!news.arcor.de.POSTED!not-for-mail Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Message-ID: <3602487.T2d5zBX4El@PointedEars.de> From: Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn Reply-To: Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn Organization: PointedEars Software (PES) Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2013 02:06:57 +0100 User-Agent: KNode/4.4.11 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8Bit Subject: Re: Email Vali8dation Problem Newsgroups: comp.lang.javascript References: Followup-To: comp.lang.javascript MIME-Version: 1.0 Lines: 25 NNTP-Posting-Date: 24 Jan 2013 02:06:59 CET NNTP-Posting-Host: eca1e3d1.newsspool4.arcor-online.net X-Trace: DXC=\GD2o_dmKLkUoRk[hk2Wal4IUKYBYU3JEom^l2K5YQID1o X-Complaints-To: usenet-abuse@arcor.de Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.javascript:18232 Eric Bednarz wrote: > "Mel Smith" writes: >> I have the following undernoted isEMail() function > > You have put it in your signature, so it is quite inconvenient to quote > it. Anyway: > http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/multipage/states-of-the > type-attribute.html#valid-e-mail-address Apparently there is no way that HTML specification writers would refrain from talking about programming languages when they have absolutely no clue what they are talking about. The “wilful violation of RFC 5322”, which will result in several valid e- mail adresses not being considered valid in WHATWG HTML, is another of those statements that can only be considered a bad joke. One can only hope that the W3C editors of HTML5 will prevent such WHATWG HTML nonsense from spreading too far. -- PointedEars Twitter: @PointedEars2 Please do not Cc: me. / Bitte keine Kopien per E-Mail.