Path: csiph.com!v102.xanadu-bbs.net!xanadu-bbs.net!feeder.erje.net!1.eu.feeder.erje.net!newsfeed.fsmpi.rwth-aachen.de!newsfeed.straub-nv.de!weretis.net!feeder1.news.weretis.net!news.solani.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn Newsgroups: comp.lang.javascript Subject: Re: Identity of values in Javascript Date: Tue, 26 May 2015 18:31:04 +0200 Organization: PointedEars Software (PES) Lines: 36 Message-ID: <358168454.buPnPcAL5r@PointedEars.de> References: <555f256b$0$12988$c3e8da3$5496439d@news.astraweb.com> <87r3q8h3yf.fsf@bsb.me.uk> <555f7d3b$0$13002$c3e8da3$5496439d@news.astraweb.com> <87d21sgpqy.fsf@bsb.me.uk> <5561f871$0$13006$c3e8da3$5496439d@news.astraweb.com> <874mn1ehbk.fsf@bsb.me.uk> <55630be0$0$13000$c3e8da3$5496439d@news.astraweb.com> <87pp5ofe2p.fsf@bsb.me.uk> <1626525.SY5O8lrZMA@PointedEars.de> <878ucbfhrf.fsf@bsb.me.uk> Reply-To: Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8Bit X-Trace: solani.org 1432658025 1912 eJwNysERwDAIA7CV4hawGYdysP8Iqd7yNxBNCw/z9a0nKafl2SmhtOz5osXsIUD9rRIDw5zSBRiLEOw= (26 May 2015 16:33:45 GMT) X-Complaints-To: abuse@news.solani.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 26 May 2015 16:33:45 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: KNode/4.14.2 X-User-ID: eJwFwQkBwDAIA0BL/AQ5a2n8S9hdemndjsqKZPK1jdsUOa4UjW287P3AFizNC2JzfN6euYKPGVk8Fzvq+AFBARUw Cancel-Lock: sha1:Sk2NIoyMopRHPkn1byjP6KVnqTs= X-NNTP-Posting-Host: eJwlyMEBADEEBMCWgsW2g0T/Jdzj5jluITGJ8ICvr5YCTDLEMDZobd2ibV2R7jd5ycPsPz4RSBFU Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.javascript:27896 Ben Bacarisse wrote: > Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn writes: >> Ben Bacarisse wrote: >>> Steven D'Aprano writes: >>>> I appreciate you guys taking the time to discuss interesting areas of >>>> compiler optimizations and so forth, and I'm not being sarcastic, but I >>>> wrote here with some concrete questions about Javascript. If they have >>>> been answered, I missed them, sorry. >>> That's a shame; you could try again. If the post has only concrete >>> questions there may be less chance of replies getting tied up in more >>> speculative matters. >> There are not going to be any concrete *correct* answers until he >> realizes that there is no “Javascript”. With *all* the implications >> of that fact. > > You have the knowledge to provide informative and helpful replies even > to questions that use the wrong terms. I get that you might choose not > to, but that's shame too. No, it is not. “I do not enlighten those who are not eager to learn, nor arouse those who are not anxious to give an explanation themselves. If I have presented one corner of the square and they cannot come back to me with the other three, I should not go over the points again.” —Confucius -- PointedEars FAQ: | SVN: Twitter: @PointedEars2 | ES Matrix: Please do not cc me. / Bitte keine Kopien per E-Mail.