Path: csiph.com!usenet.pasdenom.info!weretis.net!feeder4.news.weretis.net!news.mixmin.net!npeer.de.kpn-eurorings.net!npeer-ng0.de.kpn-eurorings.net!newsfeed.arcor.de!newsspool4.arcor-online.net!news.arcor.de.POSTED!not-for-mail
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Message-ID: <33461109.jJIhvdxLAt@PointedEars.de>
From: Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de>
Reply-To: Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <usenet@PointedEars.de>
Organization: PointedEars Software (PES)
Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2013 14:05:07 +0200
User-Agent: KNode/4.10.2
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8Bit
X-Face: %i>XG-yXR'\"2P/C_aO%~;2o~?g0pPKmbOw^=NT`tprDEf++D.m7"}HW6.#=U:?2GGctkL,f89@H46O$ASoW&?s}.k+&.<b';Md8`dH6iqhT)6C^.Px|[=M@7=Ik[_w<%n1Up"LPQNu2m8|L!/3iby{-]A+#YE}Kl{Cw$\U!kD%K}\2jz"QQP6Uqr],./"?;=4v
Face: iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAADAAAAAwBAMAAAClLOS0AAAAGFBMVEXTxa4RFk5dUWANED8PFEfy7+MGBiW+n3ZNF/QuAAACaElEQVQ4jVXUwVOcMBQG8Dc7Rc4PUntdWV2uxjDpGaGeozOp1woar4jd5t/v9wLstMwsA/ntlxdCAgUc1hjTc9/JCZfGoo3wG3HdmdAWrIJRHe7GM/TmpY5VFefuVcAkkPbLIaN8rmPmjloyZxgyR3GuJ4K0AGtJ2htz8o7yqikm759fldQXaMpbDzjKAG+8v+AugVTOPO5DOjLvGtUYQwh0CPjnVMyGd+8/GfUB5nLKJDD2aLDh5HYyMDJGDwQIo2ZmZcKbowNmAdB/AzyFhrmF2MHRb0QJJfaAnwGB6orZhoykLzJtGwF/xpYxI1dswomiUj3gTuAIqCn/4C7cULwGNBtwMTk3Y4LfKB5YUaOKBKYtpplm7u0vip8tU1NWWyI/7XdcSuIDoMt6rVHMWT0DbjHPGqDqZVSa6zleLcUTcIKLoMv3ueJluALtAo9B302zPPlrtiVScRdCjXvVh3e3JpYa/jjkuC9N+LrBMlz/eAN4eQijX2EdLo6c5tGGHwLyHFtXk89dDGHwCVhG9T0S/j55AhRZgkMCmUQXJ49TnS1wnQDvw0eAh9ICeMmEFbCnPMFzjAvsWoEWEFdYEx+S0MoUZ1gT1wId8+AF3Bl2OoEu906AUHx5VLw/gXYg/x84loOah/2UYNrgiwSwGO7RfUzVBbx/kgpckumGOi6QirtD6gkLTitbnxNol47S2jVc2vsN5kPqaAHT8uUdAJM4v/DanjYOwmUjWznGfwB7sGtAtor5BgofDuzaRj4kSQAqDakTsKORa3Q3xKi3gE1fhl71KRMqrdZ2AWNNg/YOhQyrVBnb+i+nEg4bsDA+egAAAABJRU5ErkJggg==
Subject: Re: Identifying a regex
Newsgroups: comp.lang.javascript
References: <kplir9$pj9$1@news.albasani.net> <3c26ff4d-3b91-4784-bea9-20740208b338@x4g2000yqk.googlegroups.com> <kpmu20$5q5$1@news.albasani.net> <f623b8ea-0bf3-429d-b04b-903627edfa1e@a8g2000yqp.googlegroups.com> <a796a412-dc33-49b9-b70c-b8d42c82edad@ys5g2000pbc.googlegroups.com> <5243240.MkxgVMovuV@PointedEars.de> <29f46333-2a99-46f8-81c1-7b47dade6fb3@googlegroups.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Lines: 49
NNTP-Posting-Date: 19 Jun 2013 14:05:08 CEST
NNTP-Posting-Host: 5983e3dc.newsspool2.arcor-online.net
X-Trace: DXC=CAedXdjgBd;NTD<CL>55K=A9EHlD;3Yc24Fo<]lROoR18kF<OcfhCO;`W;:Ca2SK74DZm8W4\YJN<b@mF9jNikd57a5\<`>]gf>OSlWV`MfUi1
X-Complaints-To: usenet-abuse@arcor.de
Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.javascript:20345

Michael Haufe (TNO) wrote:

> Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn wrote:
>> Observing this, one must truly wonder how these people, including you
>> unfortunately, can ever get anything done in this field.
> 
> We were all just waiting on you Prometheus to bring us your stolen gift
> from Olympus.

Correcting the misconceptions of wannabes (there) looks like a job for a 
lifetime.  I have better things to do.  You can read my articles here and in 
de.comp.lang.javascript, the ES Matrix, and my thesis instead.  And read 
reference material, written by people who actually *specified* or actually 
*built* an ECMAScript implementation.

>> Your opinion (or shall I say “your misconception”?) is on page 3 of that
>> thread here.  You should have referred to it directly, but then again you
>> would have deprived me of the experience.
> 
> If I haven't spread misery every day, I don't feel complete of course.
> 
> Mind being more discrete? My comment:
> 
> "I'm against 'new' because I believe it should be a bound method of the
> object"
> 
> I'd like to generalize to: "I'm against 'new' because I believe an object
> should be responsible for creating its own copies"
> 
> If you are referring to the "namespacing". I've abandoned this as not
> worth pursuing.
> 
> OOP based on the definition of TAPL I still follow. I suspect you are
> probably pointing at some English grammar aspect. This wouldn't be the
> first time...

Do you think that such talk will effect my going into details?
 
> *Apologies in advance if there is some formatting craziness or other issue
> with this response as I've now officially been forced into the new Google
> Groups layout...

You still have the choice of not using Google Groups for posting at all.

-- 
PointedEars

Twitter: @PointedEars2
Please do not Cc: me. / Bitte keine Kopien per E-Mail.