Path: csiph.com!v102.xanadu-bbs.net!xanadu-bbs.net!feeder.erje.net!eu.feeder.erje.net!weretis.net!feeder1.news.weretis.net!news.solani.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.javascript
Subject: Re: Dynamic CSS adjustments (JavaScript)
Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2014 10:19:16 +0200
Organization: PointedEars Software (PES)
Lines: 27
Message-ID: <3017322.EnAQyuOv26@PointedEars.de>
References: <MPG.2e1662bf95bc0a299899c1@news.demon.co.uk> <XnsA358CD0D1F4FBeejj99@194.109.133.133> <MPG.2e16b6ce69e50e579899c2@news.demon.co.uk> <toggle-20140627012335@ram.dialup.fu-berlin.de> <53acbbf8$0$6612$9b4e6d93@newsspool4.arcor-online.net> <JavaScript-20140627023856@ram.dialup.fu-berlin.de>
Reply-To: Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <cljs@PointedEars.de>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8Bit
X-Trace: solani.org 1403857157 3478 eJwFwYEBwCAIA7CXqNgyzhGF/09YQhd0Y4vaHE7WO/a0n104+lQtcoGrv8ixA1Q6lNHZHVU/H0YRJw== (27 Jun 2014 08:19:17 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: abuse@news.solani.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2014 08:19:17 +0000 (UTC)
User-Agent: KNode/4.12.4
X-User-ID: eJwNxcEBwCAIA8CVgpKA4wjq/iO09zlOmTpclPPxyXLuW162dfxkLiCaFXUVqw2TYwgZpzmYrT/cKoTwIHw/ghSW
Face: 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
X-Face: %i>XG-yXR'\"2P/C_aO%~;2o~?g0pPKmbOw^=NT`tprDEf++D.m7"}HW6.#=U:?2GGctkL,f89@H46O$ASoW&?s}.k+&.<b';Md8`dH6iqhT)6C^.Px|[=M@7=Ik[_w<%n1Up"LPQNu2m8|L!/3iby{-]A+#YE}Kl{Cw$\U!kD%K}\2jz"QQP6Uqr],./"?;=4v
Cancel-Lock: sha1:So+TP4eJeFJh/LecJ+lae3udyBA=
X-NNTP-Posting-Host: eJwNw4ENACEIA8CVFCz440CB/UfwLzmobaMfgx0MpipW9GpPXHPuvvMFhEy6AiWUhKeClfZ/OIYSSA==
Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.javascript:25066

Stefan Ram wrote:

> Christoph Michael Becker <cmbecker69@arcor.de> writes:
>>><script type="application/javascript;version=1.8" src="main.js"></script>
>>Is "application/javascript;version=1.8" standardized in any way?
> 
>   In this case, I intentionally deviate from using a standard,
>   to make readers aware of the fact that I am writing for a
>   specific (i.e., non-standard) implementation (this
>   implementation might be called »JavaScript 1.8«).

Show the vendor-specific documentation, then.  That “javascript1.7” is 
supported does not mean that “javascript1.8” has any meaning.
 
>> One should be aware that document.addEventListener() is not implemented
>> by several ECMAScript implementations
> 
>   Yes, that's why I wrote
>   »type="application/javascript;version=1.8"«, above!

You are confusing the programming language with the DOM API implementation.

-- 
PointedEars
FAQ: <http://PointedEars.de/faq> | SVN: <http://PointedEars.de/wsvn/>
Twitter: @PointedEars2 | ES Matrix: <http://PointedEars.de/es-matrix>
Please do not Cc: me. / Bitte keine Kopien per E-Mail.