Path: csiph.com!usenet.pasdenom.info!weretis.net!feeder4.news.weretis.net!newsreader4.netcologne.de!news.netcologne.de!newsfeed.arcor.de!newsspool3.arcor-online.net!news.arcor.de.POSTED!not-for-mail
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Message-ID: <2710705.sg4g0aCLjx@PointedEars.de>
From: Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de>
Reply-To: Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <usenet@PointedEars.de>
Organization: PointedEars Software (PES)
Date: Sun, 10 Feb 2013 01:27:28 +0100
User-Agent: KNode/4.8.5
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8Bit
X-Face: %i>XG-yXR'\"2P/C_aO%~;2o~?g0pPKmbOw^=NT`tprDEf++D.m7"}HW6.#=U:?2GGctkL,f89@H46O$ASoW&?s}.k+&.<b';Md8`dH6iqhT)6C^.Px|[=M@7=Ik[_w<%n1Up"LPQNu2m8|L!/3iby{-]A+#YE}Kl{Cw$\U!kD%K}\2jz"QQP6Uqr],./"?;=4v
Face: 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
Subject: Re: Script in <a  > tag in IE
Newsgroups: comp.lang.javascript
References: <urv7h8lmmckcjes30rk61nippagpq7el9l@4ax.com> <kf689p$sok$1@speranza.aioe.org> <2542700.24A3Wqytjl@PointedEars.de> <kf6nfe$6lu$1@speranza.aioe.org> <8809769.VO6lmAGIsZ@PointedEars.de> <kf6p3g$acq$1@speranza.aioe.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Lines: 68
NNTP-Posting-Date: 10 Feb 2013 01:27:29 CET
NNTP-Posting-Host: 21f94ffc.newsspool3.arcor-online.net
X-Trace: DXC=g\n4PNlId5I[kmHKHnaEnMMcF=Q^Z^V3H4Fo<]lROoRA8kF<OcfhCOKjWdeJAGglJADZm8W4\YJNLb@mF9jNikdEWWB88<dh9WEBcjolZn`;D@
X-Complaints-To: usenet-abuse@arcor.de
Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.javascript:18421

Cezary Tomczyk wrote:

> W dniu 2013-02-10 01:07, Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn pisze:
>> Cezary Tomczyk wrote:
> [...]
>>>>> 1. Don't mix behaviours with logic. Move "onclick" outside of element
>>>>> <a>.
>>>>
>>>> You have not said why.  I think there is no good reason why.  That
>>>> script code here is short enough so that it is maintainable when in an
>>>> event handler attribute value, and it is only needed when that
>>>> particular “a”
>>>> element is needed.  Loading it always would be a waste of resources.
>>>
>>> I am referring to:
>>>
>>> * 
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unobtrusive_JavaScript#Separation_of_behavior_from_markup
>>> * 
http://www.w3.org/wiki/The_principles_of_unobtrusive_JavaScript#Separation_of_structure_and_behaviour
>>>
>>> There is a lot of materials in internet about (let's use some keywords)
>>> "separate behavior content javascript".
>>>
>>> Plus ( from my memory :-) ):
>>>
>>> * HTML files are bigger by using inline events and are not cached, while
>>> JavaScript files can be cached by browsers
>>
>> Utter nonsense, all of the above.
> 
> You have not said why.

True, because we have been over this ad nauseam here already.
 
>>>>> A good example was provided by Thomas Lahn (he's second example).
>>>> Which “second example” are you referring to?
>>>
>>> [...]
>>>         a.onclick = function () {
>>>           addAttachments();
>>>           return false;
>>>         };
>>> [...]
>>>
>>> which means that attaching method to event could be done, for example,
>>> in that way. Not by using inline events.
>> This code is part of an example in which the “a” element is created
>> dynamically.  It has nothing to do with some misguided idea of
>> “Unobtrusive JavaScript”.
> 
> The code contains an fragment of adding event and method. That part I
> wanted to cite as an example of way how to add events and methods in a
> proper way. Not by inline events.

My example has nothing to do with that mindbogglingly stupid approach.
Do not cite it as an example of that.

> Also, I provided links that contains explanations "why not inline events".
> You do not have to agree with them.

I do not, because they are utter nonsense.

-- 
PointedEars

Twitter: @PointedEars2
Please do not Cc: me. / Bitte keine Kopien per E-Mail.