Path: csiph.com!usenet.pasdenom.info!weretis.net!feeder1.news.weretis.net!news.solani.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn Newsgroups: comp.lang.javascript Subject: Re: Resizing images Date: Mon, 02 Jun 2014 23:24:20 +0200 Organization: PointedEars Software (PES) Lines: 40 Message-ID: <26967375.WbWaopnbgk@PointedEars.de> References: <5388bdf3$0$6663$9b4e6d93@newsspool3.arcor-online.net> <1951203.QgmrOpL8Gj@PointedEars.de> <5389bc7c$0$6612$9b4e6d93@newsspool4.arcor-online.net> <7989382.AyDL1cKXdP@PointedEars.de> <538b6ff2$0$6602$9b4e6d93@newsspool4.arcor-online.net> <538c4e74$0$6617$9b4e6d93@newsspool4.arcor-online.net> <538cd4e6$0$6613$9b4e6d93@newsspool4.arcor-online.net> Reply-To: Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8Bit X-Trace: solani.org 1401744262 11037 eJwFwYERACEIA7CVEGjFcf7ad/8RTFBc1G6CjYvrUFocfI0daJR+TaePKyZj6ZiOUyljWA8SvhBx (2 Jun 2014 21:24:22 GMT) X-Complaints-To: abuse@news.solani.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 2 Jun 2014 21:24:22 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: KNode/4.12.4 X-User-ID: eJwNzAEBwCAIBMBKKPwDcVCkf4TtAhyUi9eNoGEwY72FN6QG7FcXHuq+UW9OysA0aCeYtjLQ4dL13LPkPw4+T9YU9Q== Face: iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAADAAAAAwBAMAAAClLOS0AAAAGFBMVEXTxa4RFk5dUWANED8PFEfy7+MGBiW+n3ZNF/QuAAACaElEQVQ4jVXUwVOcMBQG8Dc7Rc4PUntdWV2uxjDpGaGeozOp1woar4jd5t/v9wLstMwsA/ntlxdCAgUc1hjTc9/JCZfGoo3wG3HdmdAWrIJRHe7GM/TmpY5VFefuVcAkkPbLIaN8rmPmjloyZxgyR3GuJ4K0AGtJ2htz8o7yqikm759fldQXaMpbDzjKAG+8v+AugVTOPO5DOjLvGtUYQwh0CPjnVMyGd+8/GfUB5nLKJDD2aLDh5HYyMDJGDwQIo2ZmZcKbowNmAdB/AzyFhrmF2MHRb0QJJfaAnwGB6orZhoykLzJtGwF/xpYxI1dswomiUj3gTuAIqCn/4C7cULwGNBtwMTk3Y4LfKB5YUaOKBKYtpplm7u0vip8tU1NWWyI/7XdcSuIDoMt6rVHMWT0DbjHPGqDqZVSa6zleLcUTcIKLoMv3ueJluALtAo9B302zPPlrtiVScRdCjXvVh3e3JpYa/jjkuC9N+LrBMlz/eAN4eQijX2EdLo6c5tGGHwLyHFtXk89dDGHwCVhG9T0S/j55AhRZgkMCmUQXJ49TnS1wnQDvw0eAh9ICeMmEFbCnPMFzjAvsWoEWEFdYEx+S0MoUZ1gT1wId8+AF3Bl2OoEu906AUHx5VLw/gXYg/x84loOah/2UYNrgiwSwGO7RfUzVBbx/kgpckumGOi6QirtD6gkLTitbnxNol47S2jVc2vsN5kPqaAHT8uUdAJM4v/DanjYOwmUjWznGfwB7sGtAtor5BgofDuzaRj4kSQAqDakTsKORa3Q3xKi3gE1fhl71KRMqrdZ2AWNNg/YOhQyrVBnb+i+nEg4bsDA+egAAAABJRU5ErkJggg== X-Face: %i>XG-yXR'\"2P/C_aO%~;2o~?g0pPKmbOw^=NT`tprDEf++D.m7"}HW6.#=U:?2GGctkL,f89@H46O$ASoW&?s}.k+&. emf wrote: >> On 2014-06-02 06:14 Christoph Michael Becker wrote: >>> They are talking about the height of the viewport as well. >> >> Thanks. Actually the code >> >> function imageheight() { >> var i; >> for (i = 0; i < document.images.length; i += 1) { >> if (document.images[i].height === 600) { // portrait images height >> document.images[i].height = >> document.documentElement.clientHeight - 42; //padding + border >> } >> } >> } >> works OK with Firefox. Since the issue is not crucial, a note to the >> effect that "This webpage is best viewed with Firefox" should do until >> they standardize and/or implement the property. > > I expect document.documentElement.clientHeight to properly report the > viewport's height in most, if not all, contemporary browsers; see > <538a2253$0$6671$9b4e6d93@newsspool3.arcor-online.net>. Still, none of this is necessary because there is a much better solution with CSS (and it has been presented elsewhere). But the OP has demonstrated that they are an aioe.org scriptkiddie-luser who thinks they know better, so they should go right ahead implementing this nonsense. And never forget adding the "best viewed with …" part; this will really tell everyone that they are an expert in their field. Fortunately, my newsreader allows me to observe the (wrong)doings of such people from a distance, in quotations only. -- PointedEars FAQ: | SVN: Twitter: @PointedEars2 | ES Matrix: Please do not Cc: me. / Bitte keine Kopien per E-Mail.