Path: csiph.com!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!news.mb-net.net!open-news-network.org!.POSTED.178.197.213.187!not-for-mail From: Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn Newsgroups: comp.lang.javascript Subject: Re: Amazing Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2021 00:42:05 +0200 Organization: PointedEars Software (PES) Lines: 32 Message-ID: <2580837.mvXUDI8C0e@PointedEars.de> References: <1b9143cb-1874-438d-b1c5-691fe9a0c867n@googlegroups.com> <4a540cf4-fbe0-4529-91fc-a7b379328443n@googlegroups.com> <0d0422c0-1f5b-47b7-a8e5-71201c4b835en@googlegroups.com> <17b1e4e3-1470-4c67-b121-b1e019616dc1n@googlegroups.com> Reply-To: Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8Bit Injection-Info: gwaiyur.mb-net.net; posting-host="178.197.213.187"; logging-data="20223"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@open-news-network.org" User-Agent: KNode/4.14.10 Cancel-Lock: sha1:c5Y+Ck6eiH/DXWfjHhsyHMSID7A= X-Face: %i>XG-yXR'\"2P/C_aO%~;2o~?g0pPKmbOw^=NT`tprDEf++D.m7"}HW6.#=U:?2GGctkL,f89@H46O$ASoW&?s}.k+&. On Monday, March 29, 2021 at 4:02:05 PM UTC-5, The Natural Philosopher > wrote: >> On 29/03/2021 21:44, Michael Haufe (TNO) wrote: >> > On Monday, March 29, 2021 at 3:00:59 PM UTC-5, The Natural Philosopher >> > wrote: >> > >> >> The argument against OOP is that it creates more work, is far harder >> >> to understand, and produces worse, not better, code. >> > >> > I don't believe you. Can you demonstrate succinctly? >> >> Of course not. Succinct does not exist in OOP. me.facepalm(); > 1. One can claim something is true > 2. One can "know" that a claim is true because of awareness of some proof > 3. One can "know that they know" it is true by demonstration of a proof This thread reminds me of probably my favorite statement by Neil deGrasse Tyson: “One of the great challenges in this world is knowing enough about a subject to think you’re right, but not enough about the subject to know you’re wrong.” -- PointedEars FAQ: | | Twitter: @PointedEars2 | Please do not cc me./Bitte keine Kopien per E-Mail.