Path: csiph.com!v102.xanadu-bbs.net!xanadu-bbs.net!feeder.erje.net!eu.feeder.erje.net!weretis.net!feeder1.news.weretis.net!news.solani.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn Newsgroups: comp.lang.javascript Subject: Re: automatically correct the parts of speech of a document Date: Sun, 14 Sep 2014 01:48:41 +0200 Organization: PointedEars Software (PES) Lines: 56 Message-ID: <2566780.9Sroepmfnc@PointedEars.de> References: <11860548.dnrLxRqcMh@PointedEars.de> <3287130.HeXyGakYei@PointedEars.de> <130920141801038237%timstreater@greenbee.net> <2590187.bqdmLbB4lb@PointedEars.de> <130920142036086519%timstreater@greenbee.net> Reply-To: Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8Bit X-Trace: solani.org 1410652146 19585 eJwNyUcBwDAMBDBKuXjFcDz5Q2j1lZBCy1hFWVaWT1JO+RuPiiQVNP0HuxMHNFVu6M4N3gV/J48Rsw== (13 Sep 2014 23:49:06 GMT) X-Complaints-To: abuse@news.solani.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 13 Sep 2014 23:49:06 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: KNode/4.14 X-User-ID: eJwFwYEBwCAIA7CXpNCC5ziR/09YQpfpZogKDgccM1avL8WNsjqR8nPTMBp/0ms89eaFQhO1ck6DDw2PHy44FLQ= Cancel-Lock: sha1:0R4fDT8FZBiRvEdczJhEwfubhus= X-NNTP-Posting-Host: eJwFwQERADEIAzBLQFfYy+EG9S/hEyI9X51kHooCCW7sZexIr6xLWAt8tM5cTGDgcNllzw8VYBDJ Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.javascript:25848 Tim Streater wrote: > Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn wrote: >> Tim Streater wrote: >> > […] Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn […] wrote: >> >> Joao Rodrigues wrote: >> >> > The first edition of ECMAScript appeared 2 years after the >> >> > advent of JavaScript in May, 1995 by Brendan Eich. >> >> True, but irrelevant. >> > >> > What's irrelevant is your fixation with the capitalisation of >> > javascript, >> >> There is no fixation. A false conclusion was drawn by Joao and refuted. >> >> There is no “javascript” in the first place, so there cannot be a >> “capitalisation” of it. As I have showed repeatedly, > > "shown". Both forms are correct as the past participle of “(to) show”. > Except that you haven't. Well, I have, but you prefer to ignore all the evidence, including this thread. > You've merely asserted it in your childish and pedantic way. > >> it is more appropriate to refer to “javascript” as the potentially >> misleading lowercase variant of “JavaScript”, indicating that there would >> be only one such programming language when there is not. > > Stuff and nonsense, child. Go back to your teddy-bear. A Steiff, for > preference. How very eloquent. Unfortunately, you do not realize that seeking the truth is anything but childish when the latter term is understood in a negative way. However, in fact, attempting to deride something by calling it “childish” ignores the fact that children are usually and naturally more eager to learn, and to check and replace their misconceptions, than adults – a quality that you seem to have lost. You do well in the other area that is usually attributed to immaturity, though: not listening to factual arguments, and posing with ad hominem arguments instead. I think I will stop discussing with you before you make a threat referring to your big brother, and you cause the level of discussion to drop below the gutter. -- PointedEars FAQ: | SVN: Twitter: @PointedEars2 | ES Matrix: Please do not Cc: me. / Bitte keine Kopien per E-Mail.