Path: csiph.com!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed8.news.xs4all.nl!news.dns-netz.com!news.freedyn.net!news.mb-net.net!open-news-network.org!.POSTED.0.237.197.178.dynamic.wless.lssmb00p-cgnat.res.cust.swisscom.ch!not-for-mail
From: Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.javascript
Subject: Re: Picture colors decreasing script.
Supersedes: <4298051.LvFx2qVVIh@PointedEars.de>
Date: Wed, 03 Mar 2021 21:33:35 +0100
Organization: PointedEars Software (PES)
Lines: 20
Message-ID: <2188480.ElGaqSPkdT@PointedEars.de>
References: <7fbf64ec-ed11-4ee7-b530-459e5681651en@googlegroups.com> <91fc5c33-11cc-480d-8703-272e7d161849n@googlegroups.com> <5440012.DvuYhMxLoT@PointedEars.de> <52708860-8e17-4136-b79d-f76002425ce2n@googlegroups.com> <5689266.lOV4Wx5bFT@PointedEars.de> <ae17e712-ed89-4b7c-9a6e-c4d2d224bbb2n@googlegroups.com>
Reply-To: Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <cljs@PointedEars.de>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit
Injection-Info: gwaiyur.mb-net.net; posting-host="0.237.197.178.dynamic.wless.lssmb00p-cgnat.res.cust.swisscom.ch:178.197.237.0"; logging-data="3634"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@open-news-network.org"
User-Agent: KNode/4.14.10
Cancel-Key: sha1:/QNQZYJm0r+zLaUlaDSOf6dKr/0=
Cancel-Lock: sha1:Y3p3X4b+sMZf80B2WTArfs/uPHU=
Face: iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAADAAAAAwBAMAAAClLOS0AAAAGFBMVEXTxa4RFk5dUWANED8PFEfy7+MGBiW+n3ZNF/QuAAACaElEQVQ4jVXUwVOcMBQG8Dc7Rc4PUntdWV2uxjDpGaGeozOp1woar4jd5t/v9wLstMwsA/ntlxdCAgUc1hjTc9/JCZfGoo3wG3HdmdAWrIJRHe7GM/TmpY5VFefuVcAkkPbLIaN8rmPmjloyZxgyR3GuJ4K0AGtJ2htz8o7yqikm759fldQXaMpbDzjKAG+8v+AugVTOPO5DOjLvGtUYQwh0CPjnVMyGd+8/GfUB5nLKJDD2aLDh5HYyMDJGDwQIo2ZmZcKbowNmAdB/AzyFhrmF2MHRb0QJJfaAnwGB6orZhoykLzJtGwF/xpYxI1dswomiUj3gTuAIqCn/4C7cULwGNBtwMTk3Y4LfKB5YUaOKBKYtpplm7u0vip8tU1NWWyI/7XdcSuIDoMt6rVHMWT0DbjHPGqDqZVSa6zleLcUTcIKLoMv3ueJluALtAo9B302zPPlrtiVScRdCjXvVh3e3JpYa/jjkuC9N+LrBMlz/eAN4eQijX2EdLo6c5tGGHwLyHFtXk89dDGHwCVhG9T0S/j55AhRZgkMCmUQXJ49TnS1wnQDvw0eAh9ICeMmEFbCnPMFzjAvsWoEWEFdYEx+S0MoUZ1gT1wId8+AF3Bl2OoEu906AUHx5VLw/gXYg/x84loOah/2UYNrgiwSwGO7RfUzVBbx/kgpckumGOi6QirtD6gkLTitbnxNol47S2jVc2vsN5kPqaAHT8uUdAJM4v/DanjYOwmUjWznGfwB7sGtAtor5BgofDuzaRj4kSQAqDakTsKORa3Q3xKi3gE1fhl71KRMqrdZ2AWNNg/YOhQyrVBnb+i+nEg4bsDA+egAAAABJRU5ErkJggg==
X-Face: %i>XG-yXR'\"2P/C_aO%~;2o~?g0pPKmbOw^=NT`tprDEf++D.m7"}HW6.#=U:?2GGctkL,f89@H46O$ASoW&?s}.k+&.<b';Md8`dH6iqhT)6C^.Px|[=M@7=Ik[_w<%n1Up"LPQNu2m8|L!/3iby{-]A+#YE}Kl{Cw$\U!kD%K}\2jz"QQP6Uqr],./"?;=4v
X-User-ID: U2FsdGVkX18ApYbqQCOi09Jch12LtGcx0r4GtBUFnvn5qsvHB7tecg==
Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.javascript:39559

Michael Haufe (TNO) wrote:

> On Wednesday, March 3, 2021 at 12:47:12 PM UTC-6, Thomas 'PointedEars'
> Lahn wrote:
>> What is the functional difference between your code and mine?
> 
> You're calling slice obviously. If you mean what's the semantic
> difference: nothing. It's the same.

No, I was asking about the *functional* difference.
 
> What matters more in this context would be performance.

Why do you think that .slice() would perform worse than accessing individual 
consecutive items directly?

-- 
PointedEars
FAQ: <http://PointedEars.de/faq> | <http://PointedEars.de/es-matrix>
<https://github.com/PointedEars> | <http://PointedEars.de/wsvn/>
Twitter: @PointedEars2 | Please do not cc me./Bitte keine Kopien per E-Mail.