Path: csiph.com!v102.xanadu-bbs.net!xanadu-bbs.net!feeder.erje.net!eu.feeder.erje.net!weretis.net!feeder1.news.weretis.net!news.solani.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.javascript
Subject: Re: <noscript> problem
Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2015 12:23:09 +0100
Organization: PointedEars Software (PES)
Lines: 34
Message-ID: <1986765.kctdokAczp@PointedEars.de>
References: <chkuofFkr3cU1@mid.individual.net> <4697302.KGi74S5ZeA@PointedEars.de> <5c0dbal16ktrhjdo2gg7ordio8mo1d59b9@4ax.com> <1822206.RplnyvqCyS@PointedEars.de> <150120151531103967%timstreater@greenbee.net> <2420110.cANBj9i1JB@PointedEars.de> <150120151638246015%timstreater@greenbee.net> <2060932.5UeBkQ9cql@PointedEars.de> <k17gba92bmqhoinf3hejng11deqvkdapho@4ax.com> <7487795.GyfY2G4M2i@PointedEars.de> <83mhbap1vkuo7drbgrh7clo47siql8jpf7@4ax.com>
Reply-To: Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <cljs@PointedEars.de>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8Bit
X-Trace: solani.org 1421493814 9933 eJwNx8kBwCAIBMCWBHZRyyEc/Zdg5jc0F88Np4PDubKPzloIM1g6Kr86/LsVWglY6EiwMdl9HwefEPc= (17 Jan 2015 11:23:34 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: abuse@news.solani.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2015 11:23:34 +0000 (UTC)
User-Agent: KNode/4.14.2
X-User-ID: eJwFwYEBwCAIA7CXhrRFzxGQ/09YQpepAqLA4WT5PLBP37LOwNvqtrN9afILLPN8H/aNZJaYshMngFllwR9tjhVu
Cancel-Lock: sha1:Grx5rx9yNJdXM9l4ACDWCJYR4GA=
X-NNTP-Posting-Host: eJwFwQkBwEAIAzBNPKUgB3bgX8ISWEh89EA4Dmc0FaHZBlLrpp0rrpit7Xj7UDXIZPUN5wcE8xDu
Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.javascript:26606

John Harris wrote:

> […] Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn […] wrote:
>> John Harris wrote:
>>> […] Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn […] wrote:
>>>> It would appear that you are getting at that I did not provide a
>>>> rationale for my request.  Apparently then, you are unaware that there
>>>> is a common rationale for keeping attribution lines short.  Therefore, 
>>>> I did not give one (again).
>>> 
>>> And it has been demonstrated here that that 'rationale' is flawed. It
>>> can fall flat on its face as I have demonstrated in earlier articles.
>> Name them.
> 
> Repeated below.

If that is all you have to say, I rest my case.

>>> The 'rationale' makes an assumption that simply isn't true.
>>What is the assumption made that simply is not true IYHO?
> 
> As Dr Johnson famously said, I refute it thus :-
> 
> Thomas Lahn said:
>> […]

“wrote” is more commonly used than “said”, partially by newsreader defaults.  
But where is the refutation?

-- 
PointedEars
FAQ: <http://PointedEars.de/faq> | SVN: <http://PointedEars.de/wsvn/>
Twitter: @PointedEars2 | ES Matrix: <http://PointedEars.de/es-matrix>
Please do not cc me. / Bitte keine Kopien per E-Mail.