Path: csiph.com!aioe.org!news.mb-net.net!open-news-network.org!.POSTED.214.226.197.178.dynamic.wless.zhbmb00p-cgnat.res.cust.swisscom.ch!not-for-mail From: Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn Newsgroups: comp.lang.javascript Subject: Re: simple question Date: Sun, 12 Nov 2017 22:39:36 +0100 Organization: PointedEars Software (PES) Lines: 47 Message-ID: <1926921.irdbgypaU6@PointedEars.de> References: <87375jwp8x.fsf@bsb.me.uk> <4024886.LvFx2qVVIh@PointedEars.de> <87shdjutqw.fsf@bsb.me.uk> Reply-To: Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8Bit Injection-Info: gwaiyur.mb-net.net; posting-host="214.226.197.178.dynamic.wless.zhbmb00p-cgnat.res.cust.swisscom.ch:178.197.226.214"; logging-data="29187"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@open-news-network.org" User-Agent: KNode/4.14.2 Face: 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 X-Face: %i>XG-yXR'\"2P/C_aO%~;2o~?g0pPKmbOw^=NT`tprDEf++D.m7"}HW6.#=U:?2GGctkL,f89@H46O$ASoW&?s}.k+&. Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn writes: > > Are you counting the "..."? (I would not be surprised!) Otherwise I > see only one. The dots are the obvious syntax errors, yes. >> simply would not do what you think it does. > > How on Earth do you know that? In your favor, I have assumed reasonable thinking, but obviously I was wrong. > Obviously I'm guessing a bit about what the OP wants, but it does what > I want! Oh, really? And what would that be? >> Also, the HTML is still invalid. > > Of course. What possible value could there be in my adding the missing > title element to the OP's HTML? The missing “title” element is not the problem because this code needs to be inserted in an HTML document that is supposed to have a “title” element already; the missing “type” attribute (HTML 4) or invalid (HTML 4.01/XHTML 1.0 Strict)/obsolete (HTML 5) “language” attribute of the “script” element is the problem. >> >> >> >> Head shaking, > > How pompous can you be? You are projecting. -- PointedEars FAQ: | | Twitter: @PointedEars2 | Please do not cc me./Bitte keine Kopien per E-Mail.