Path: csiph.com!aioe.org!rt.uk.eu.org!newsfeed.datemas.de!feeder.erje.net!eu.feeder.erje.net!eweka.nl!lightspeed.eweka.nl!193.141.40.65.MISMATCH!npeer.de.kpn-eurorings.net!npeer-ng0.de.kpn-eurorings.net!newsfeed.arcor.de!newsspool3.arcor-online.net!news.arcor.de.POSTED!not-for-mail Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Message-ID: <1869873.iZa5zYhF1L@PointedEars.de> From: Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn Reply-To: Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn Organization: PointedEars Software (PES) Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2013 11:54:45 +0100 User-Agent: KNode/4.4.11 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8Bit Subject: Re: lazy loading Newsgroups: comp.lang.javascript References: <26652061.r6ho1VWPFL@PointedEars.de> <2235742.z2lgNHdsKG@PointedEars.de> Followup-To: comp.lang.javascript MIME-Version: 1.0 Lines: 51 NNTP-Posting-Date: 21 Jan 2013 11:54:45 CET NNTP-Posting-Host: 8537a38d.newsspool4.arcor-online.net X-Trace: DXC=76a;niBdB?A@Y=h<_c3PkH4IUKBPJf^4cMk`UK X-Complaints-To: usenet-abuse@arcor.de Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.javascript:18186 Osmo Saarikumpu wrote: > On 17.1.2013 23:00, Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn wrote: >>> Andrew Poulos wrote: >>>> >>> Interesting. IE, Firefox and Chrome have been supporting it since >>> forever with Opera as the only holdout. >> Perhaps. I am still not sure to what extent caniuse.com results can be >> trusted, and would suggest you do your own tests instead. > > Seems more reliable than W3Schools :), Which appears not too hard to do, so it does not count in my book. > which includes the Opera logo and > says: "The defer attribute is supported in all major browsers." > > (http://www.w3schools.com/tags/att_script_defer.asp) > > Last week I downloaded Opera 12 [Opera/9.80 (Windows NT 5.1) > Presto/2.12.388 Version/12.12] and it does not pass the "Try it > yourself" example there > > (http://www.w3schools.com/tags/tryit.asp?filename=tryhtml_script_defer) > > nor my own defer test page. ACK. The problem of statements using a relation like ”is supported in” (IMHO better: by) with ranges like “*major* browsers” is that it is deferring (no pun intended) the truth value of that statement to a subjective definition for “major browser”, making the seemingly objective statement actually a subjective one. The “all” quantifier of the relation then merely adds to the subjectivity of the statement. If W3Schools.com would not consider Opera Browser a “major browser”, which would therefore not be an instance of the subclass of “major browsers” (and one can easily make a class definition based on the property of market share so that it would not apply to Opera Browser), there is a probability greater than zero that under *that* interpretation that statement is correct. Therefore, arguments of that kind are informal fallacies: -- PointedEars Twitter: @PointedEars2 Please do not Cc: me. / Bitte keine Kopien per E-Mail.