Path: csiph.com!aioe.org!news.mb-net.net!open-news-network.org!.POSTED.196.236.197.178.dynamic.wless.lssmb00p-cgnat.res.cust.swisscom.ch!not-for-mail
From: Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.javascript
Subject: Re: A simpler DOM in JS
Date: Mon, 05 Feb 2018 06:15:15 +0100
Organization: PointedEars Software (PES)
Lines: 25
Message-ID: <1678480.CQOukoFCf9@PointedEars.de>
References: <fb9172c3-3151-46c7-815d-b4535c60fe7d@googlegroups.com> <p571ms$ido$1@news.albasani.net>
Reply-To: Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <cljs@PointedEars.de>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8Bit
Injection-Info: gwaiyur.mb-net.net; posting-host="196.236.197.178.dynamic.wless.lssmb00p-cgnat.res.cust.swisscom.ch:178.197.236.196"; logging-data="17844"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@open-news-network.org"
User-Agent: KNode/4.14.2
Cancel-Lock: sha1:Br2bw8CkJdM7dDKeHCG5p3Zg26Q=
X-User-ID: U2FsdGVkX1/90bt5DAUyuJCjG+VJ6w8US2y5KrZVz8GHW79QFeCcUA==
X-Face: %i>XG-yXR'\"2P/C_aO%~;2o~?g0pPKmbOw^=NT`tprDEf++D.m7"}HW6.#=U:?2GGctkL,f89@H46O$ASoW&?s}.k+&.<b';Md8`dH6iqhT)6C^.Px|[=M@7=Ik[_w<%n1Up"LPQNu2m8|L!/3iby{-]A+#YE}Kl{Cw$\U!kD%K}\2jz"QQP6Uqr],./"?;=4v
Face: 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
Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.javascript:34696

Martin Honnen wrote:

> I liked E4X and I think it would have worked

ACK.

> had there been a DOM integration but as far as I remember that never
> happened.

According to the ECMAScript Support Matrix, Firefox 1.6 to 20 had E4X 
support, i.e. before that died the Mozilla.com death.  It is a guess,
but the argument was probably the same old fallacy: “Nobody uses it.”
 
> Whether browser-side JS needs another library based API for node
> creation I am not sure, it looks like most people are happy with
> throwing there string fragments into JQuery.

Implementing Emmet would be a good idea, too, but given support in Atom 
(currently, emmet 2.4.3), somebody probably has already done it in/for 
Google V8 JavaScript.

-- 
PointedEars
FAQ: <http://PointedEars.de/faq> | <http://PointedEars.de/es-matrix>
<https://github.com/PointedEars> | <http://PointedEars.de/wsvn/>
Twitter: @PointedEars2 | Please do not cc me./Bitte keine Kopien per E-Mail.