Path: csiph.com!weretis.net!feeder7.news.weretis.net!news.roellig-ltd.de!open-news-network.org!news4.open-news-network.org!.POSTED.home.meteotest.ch!not-for-mail From: Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn Newsgroups: comp.lang.javascript Subject: Re: Firefox changed IFRAME behaviour - I need a remedy?? Date: Mon, 05 Aug 2019 13:48:33 +0200 Organization: PointedEars Software (PES) Lines: 44 Message-ID: <1676946.idUJCsOoGn@PointedEars.de> References: <593a3b98-6915-4561-b4df-0b096d1cdd56@googlegroups.com> <0d372bee-66f1-4aa6-9b15-2b802c70c1a6@googlegroups.com> <4a0f55db-a21c-4fb1-aec3-e678e40b41e0@googlegroups.com> <1783375.m5R59jPM9B@PointedEars.de> <4d37f8fe-1e46-4eac-8e1b-df9756377688@googlegroups.com> Reply-To: Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8Bit Injection-Info: news4.open-news-network.org; posting-host="home.meteotest.ch:178.22.109.226"; logging-data="22225"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@exeter.123backup.de" User-Agent: KNode/4.14.10 X-Face: %i>XG-yXR'\"2P/C_aO%~;2o~?g0pPKmbOw^=NT`tprDEf++D.m7"}HW6.#=U:?2GGctkL,f89@H46O$ASoW&?s}.k+&. On Sunday, August 4, 2019 at 4:30:55 AM UTC-5, Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn > wrote: >> Michael Haufe (TNO) wrote: >> > [..] Hungarian Notation [..] is reasonable in programming languages >> > without a sufficient type system (like modern JavaScript) […] >> >> Are you saying that you think that “modern JavaScript” would have a >> “sufficient type system”? > > No. By "sufficient" I mean expressive enough to represent and enforce the > semantic meaning of what the notation represents. Example: > > var imgBird; > > vs. > > var bird: Image; But that is merely your *opinion*. Apparently more people think that the current ECMAScript type system is sufficient than not, either because they do not care; because they are using ECMAScript implementations like Dart, TypeScript, and Flow that have static type-checking natively; or because they use precompilers or some other way to enforce types. And the JavaScripts (sic) are not alone in this approach of *dynamic* type- checking, and *implicit* type conversion. Example: Python. It is a matter of approach, not an objective measure of sufficiency. > JavaScript still lacks any meaningful syntactic means of such > representation. There not even anything significant on the road map[1]. That depends on what you consider “JavaScript” to be, but it is mostly true. -- PointedEars FAQ: | | Twitter: @PointedEars2 | Please do not cc me./Bitte keine Kopien per E-Mail.