Path: csiph.com!usenet.pasdenom.info!dedibox.gegeweb.org!gegeweb.eu!nntpfeed.proxad.net!proxad.net!feeder2-2.proxad.net!newsfeed.arcor.de!newsspool1.arcor-online.net!news.arcor.de.POSTED!not-for-mail Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Message-ID: <1589111.ZGqaern48i@PointedEars.de> From: Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn Reply-To: Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn Organization: PointedEars Software (PES) Date: Wed, 06 Nov 2013 01:12:14 +0100 User-Agent: KNode/4.10.5 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8Bit X-Face: %i>XG-yXR'\"2P/C_aO%~;2o~?g0pPKmbOw^=NT`tprDEf++D.m7"}HW6.#=U:?2GGctkL,f89@H46O$ASoW&?s}.k+&. <52746391-8843-470d-87eb-8e1a047c2121@googlegroups.com> <588259be-d375-43db-91aa-c6f658ad5625@googlegroups.com> <526f2152$0$6558$9b4e6d93@newsspool4.arcor-online.net> <5974547d-0c8f-4083-98e2-412b44a9e018@googlegroups.com> <3316232.tN5FpDIeGy@PointedEars.de> <46942ffa-1a7a-46f3-92a7-8dc5ade0b596@googlegroups.com> <1809326.V1qVYlCJvj@PointedEars.de> <1383549540.TNsZB9pSnc@PointedEars.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Lines: 39 NNTP-Posting-Date: 06 Nov 2013 01:12:17 CET NNTP-Posting-Host: c51d36a0.newsspool2.arcor-online.net X-Trace: DXC=2>Qb5;IBXWAlU`@c^jLCbJA9EHlD;3YcB4Fo<]lROoRA8kF@[hLNg?mIdnc […] Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn […] posted: >> There are better ways to resolve this that I am going to investigate, and >> will implement for the FAQ for comp.lang.javascript if and when I am sure >> that they cannot and will not be abused in order to steal intellectual >> property, or, in general, to use it only for one's own benefit. > > You have no right to write or edit a FAQ for comp.lang.javascript, since > you have not been generally agreed by the users of comp.lang.javascript And I presume you presume to be someone who can forbid me that which you have done yourself. > to be anything like a suitable person. For that matter, nobody has agreed that you are anything like a suitable person either. How dare you to have a copy of the original FAQ at your site, then? > The first hurdle, at which you have fallen, is to be manifestly usually > amiable. You appear to be under the illusion that you and your opinion are still held here in high regard. > You can write a JavaScript FAQ of your own, but that will need to stand > or fall by its own merits, if any. No, it will not have to. You have neither been paying attention nor have you cared to read carefully the posting you have replied to. -- PointedEars Twitter: @PointedEars2 Please do not Cc: me. / Bitte keine Kopien per E-Mail.