Path: csiph.com!v102.xanadu-bbs.net!xanadu-bbs.net!feeder.erje.net!eu.feeder.erje.net!weretis.net!feeder4.news.weretis.net!feeder1.news.weretis.net!news.solani.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.javascript
Subject: Re: Element visible
Date: Wed, 09 Jul 2014 11:18 +0200
Organization: PointedEars Software (PES)
Lines: 20
Message-ID: <13026944.5APpuSVIFp@PointedEars.de>
References: <eoidnRvwreMiFSHOnZ2dnUVZ_q-dnZ2d@westnet.com.au> <visibility-20140709041836@ram.dialup.fu-berlin.de> <j9idnT3Ozq34JSHOnZ2dnUVZ_hydnZ2d@westnet.com.au>
Reply-To: Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <cljs@PointedEars.de>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8Bit
X-Trace: solani.org 1404897481 6788 eJwNx9ERACEIA9GW4AgRy/EY038JMvvzNoPOXmASqRQQ8qK3y671PbN7xemyDzaUR8L2VH+IDwk0EAY= (9 Jul 2014 09:18:01 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: abuse@news.solani.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 9 Jul 2014 09:18:01 +0000 (UTC)
User-Agent: KNode/4.12.4
X-User-ID: eJwFwYEBwCAIA7CXQKHWcwrM/09YkhuOPoFE5Mv3xWD7jSanxJmxVUv0o7hhzp1ZIZwaL6NMn4jezNa6gx9UBxWH
Face: 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
X-Face: %i>XG-yXR'\"2P/C_aO%~;2o~?g0pPKmbOw^=NT`tprDEf++D.m7"}HW6.#=U:?2GGctkL,f89@H46O$ASoW&?s}.k+&.<b';Md8`dH6iqhT)6C^.Px|[=M@7=Ik[_w<%n1Up"LPQNu2m8|L!/3iby{-]A+#YE}Kl{Cw$\U!kD%K}\2jz"QQP6Uqr],./"?;=4v
Cancel-Lock: sha1:QytcWqHAW5jQM6+b9LppoXgsCGg=
X-NNTP-Posting-Host: eJwNycERACAIA7CV4KCA42jR/UeQyzOw0GB6IBxvSL4ySrNWc2lU7SYMN/U4Hbi2j2TOsq0+G7URQg==
Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.javascript:25267

Andrew Poulos wrote:

> On 9/07/2014 12:18 PM, Stefan Ram wrote:
>> Andrew Poulos <ap_prog@hotmail.com> writes:
>>> Is the only way to know if an element could (ignoring if its been
>>> scrolled off screen or under another element) be visible is to test that
>>> its display is not 'none', its opacity is greater than 0, its visibility
>>> is 'visible', and that its width and height are greater than zero?
>>
>> cssexample { position: absolute; width: 14em; left: -999em; }
> 
> And also ignoring other instances where its positioned off screen.

Wrong newsgroup, stupid/no question → stupid/no answer.

-- 
PointedEars
FAQ: <http://PointedEars.de/faq> | SVN: <http://PointedEars.de/wsvn/>
Twitter: @PointedEars2 | ES Matrix: <http://PointedEars.de/es-matrix>
Please do not Cc: me. / Bitte keine Kopien per E-Mail.