Path: csiph.com!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: =?UTF-8?Q?Arne_Vajh=C3=B8j?= <arne@vajhoej.dk>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.java.programmer
Subject: Re: ANN: Dogelog Player 1.1.4 (Generational GC)
Date: Sat, 20 Jan 2024 11:20:44 -0500
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 20
Message-ID: <uogrss$3o3e0$1@dont-email.me>
References: <ukaevd$260j2$4@solani.org> <ulqf6q$3jk9$2@solani.org> <unglct$795a$4@solani.org> <uof2fo$m4av$4@solani.org> <uog5vj$ml7a$4@solani.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Sat, 20 Jan 2024 16:20:44 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="893027ec0e7835006e8856c6b317aedf"; logging-data="3935680"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18BnseFa5iltcU9QwEpD9teRkSS+BfZy4I="
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:JJqsHLB+lV5xapzy6GPH68EKrVQ=
In-Reply-To: <uog5vj$ml7a$4@solani.org>
Content-Language: en-US
Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.java.programmer:53141

On 1/20/2024 5:06 AM, Mild Shock wrote:
> Our initial testing with CPython was consistently
> very disappointing, so that we switched to PyPy,
> the alternative JIT-ing implementation of Python.
> With running Doglog Player via PyPy it becomes
> comparable in performance to the JavaScript target,
> both targets now only lack by ca 50% behind the
> Java target and SWI-Prolog.

PyPy is "a" alternative JIT-ing implementation of Python.

There are other - including GraalPython and IronPython.
GraalPython performs very well.

And if you are to the more exotic you can look
at AOT with Cython or Codon.

Arne