Path: csiph.com!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!reader5.news.weretis.net!news.solani.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.java.programmer
Subject: Re: ANN: Dogelog Player 1.1.4 (Generational GC)
Date: Sat, 20 Jan 2024 11:06:43 +0100
Message-ID: <uog5vj$ml7a$4@solani.org>
References: <ukaevd$260j2$4@solani.org> <ulqf6q$3jk9$2@solani.org> <unglct$795a$4@solani.org> <uof2fo$m4av$4@solani.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Sat, 20 Jan 2024 10:06:43 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: solani.org; logging-data="742634"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@news.solani.org"
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/91.0 SeaMonkey/2.53.18.1
Cancel-Lock: sha1:AeEVtHVleH0nSSbe9LaxtFgeeoY=
In-Reply-To: <uof2fo$m4av$4@solani.org>
X-User-ID: eJwNzAkBwDAIA0BLPCFgp4XiX8J2Ai6cyk4wiNhYh+K2X02bQS3qHaZYW7v4jvFRk4nFE2mRWxP1B3qCs/0BP6IVIw==
Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.java.programmer:53135


Our initial testing with CPython was consistently
very disappointing, so that we switched to PyPy,
the alternative JIT-ing implementation of Python.
With running Doglog Player via PyPy it becomes
comparable in performance to the JavaScript target,
both targets now only lack by ca 50% behind the
Java target and SWI-Prolog.

See also:

Streaming HTTP for Dogelog Player [corrected]
https://twitter.com/dogelogch/status/1748646455999332354

Streaming HTTP for Dogelog Player [corrected]
https://www.facebook.com/groups/dogelog

Mild Shock schrieb:
> 
> Dogelog Player is a 100% Prolog written Prolog
> interpreter. We started seeding the implementation
> of a common HTTP Server library for all targets
> JavaScript, Python and Java. Lets take a snapshot of
> the current API and report some performance experience.
> 
> We could complete a minimal library(spin) and
> demonstrate the correct UTF-8 HTTP streaming of a
> text stream. We then measured the local delivery of
> a hobbit.txt file of 50'000 bytes, we also run
> against SWI-Prolog. We were positively surprised by
> the performance of JavaScript, Java and SWI-Prolog.
> Only the Python performance was a little disappointing.
> 
> See also:
> 
> Streaming HTTP for Dogelog Player
> https://twitter.com/dogelogch/status/1748477496364818517
> 
> Streaming HTTP for Dogelog Player
> https://www.facebook.com/groups/dogelog