Path: csiph.com!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Andreas Leitgeb <avl@logic.at>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.java.programmer
Subject: IntStream.rangeClosed()   (was: Re: Inclusive or exclusive array)
Date: Wed, 31 Jul 2019 11:33:06 -0000 (UTC)
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 11
Message-ID: <slrnqk2v3i.36g.avl@logic.at>
References: <87zhkvmqx8.fsf@munus.decebal.nl> <qhpsjq$ahi$1@dont-email.me>
Reply-To: avl@logic.at
Injection-Date: Wed, 31 Jul 2019 11:33:06 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: reader02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="b8438de1153d556f5125f65d4e9081d1"; logging-data="10021"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/4R4EDGwogd+L9P5pkFh2m"
User-Agent: slrn/1.0.3 (Linux)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:xxC8x9nYlenQZPQE2Sa7qg9WkTk=
Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.java.programmer:39041

Eric Sosman <esosman@comcast-dot-net.invalid> wrote:
> 	java.util.stream.IntStream::rangeClosed(int, int)

Doc says that the sequence is equivalent to the following for loop:
   for (int i = startInclusive; i <= endInclusive ; i++) { ... }

Does that mean in practice that an IntStream.rangeClosed() with
Integer.MAX_VALUE given for endInclusive should produce an "infinite"
stream of integers, as the for loop would do with such a condition?

PS: Apparently it does not. Is the javadoc "imprecise"?