Path: csiph.com!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Andreas Leitgeb <avl@logic.at>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.java.programmer
Subject: Re: Not closing a SQL(ite3) connection
Date: Sat, 12 Aug 2017 08:51:04 -0000 (UTC)
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 23
Message-ID: <slrnootgjj.o2q.avl@logic.at>
References: <87a839um2q.fsf@munus.decebal.nl> <omg0la$1qe3$1@gioia.aioe.org> <874lte1pdj.fsf@munus.decebal.nl> <omli1h$jt7$1@gioia.aioe.org> <87k229z041.fsf@munus.decebal.nl>
Reply-To: avl@logic.at
Injection-Date: Sat, 12 Aug 2017 08:51:04 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: mx02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="b17b58269513967be9f55d4ca24024d5"; logging-data="1662"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+2QaOKpBldH0UBfmcdPtk1"
User-Agent: slrn/1.0.2 (Linux)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:6bQYMzC83ByZcJlJeF4UKBOka0k=
Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.java.programmer:37139

Cecil Westerhof <Cecil@decebal.nl> wrote:
> You did not read this part?
> And also not this?

The net is a busy place.  Sometimes, people here do a simple
"optimization" based on the likelihood of helping divided by
effort:

-) reading a longish description (prose) is "much effort".
-) spotting some fishy code constellation is little effort.

In many cases, the fishy code constellation is already the
problem, so effort is saved by not reading the prose.

In those rare cases where the prose happens to be essential
and an answer thus ends up not helpful, it is expected that
the OP will say so and also shorten the prose - afterall
it's him who wants more helpful replies.

PS: Didn't read this prose? Doesn't matter. It was still less 
effort to write, than to wrap my head around the motivation
for each single method. ;-)