Path: csiph.com!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Jeff Higgins Newsgroups: comp.lang.java.programmer Subject: Re: Character.isIdentifierIgnorable Date: Sat, 25 Apr 2020 09:53:16 -0400 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 30 Message-ID: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Date: Sat, 25 Apr 2020 13:53:47 -0000 (UTC) Injection-Info: reader02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="8bde102b135c44810c0703087ce3707b"; logging-data="17879"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19nW3QQQqv5FOESmSaNTKSP7OLSrr0r4OM=" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.7.0 Cancel-Lock: sha1:gJ2C4/rSWc+xbG0AJ5pNy0jjgnc= In-Reply-To: Content-Language: en-US Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.java.programmer:39446 On 4/24/20 8:42 PM, Jeff Higgins wrote: > On 4/24/20 8:32 PM, Arne Vajhøj wrote: >> On 4/24/2020 8:25 PM, Jeff Higgins wrote: >>> On 4/24/20 6:54 PM, Arne Vajhøj wrote: >>> >> >> Different implementation of a compiler can behave >> differently. >> >> Any differences in normal code will be found pretty >> quickly. >> >> But differences in funky code may go undetected >> for years. > > Yes, is funky. > I think I'll ask in an Eclipse forum. > Reply from Eclipse JDT forum points to a couple of bug reports. Both made interesting reading for me. Cf. https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=547817 , https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=547601 Feel free to join the discussion in either of these bugs. So, for my own use; I think I will do more reading around Unicode UAX#31 before I decide how to implement my names.