Path: csiph.com!v102.xanadu-bbs.net!xanadu-bbs.net!feeder.erje.net!eu.feeder.erje.net!news.swapon.de!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail From: cl@isbd.net Newsgroups: comp.lang.java.programmer,comp.sys.raspberry-pi Subject: Re: Java ME or SE? Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2014 16:48:58 +0000 Lines: 15 Message-ID: References: <2dj16ahot0c6v296vlnllh7roj9avqebt5@4ax.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: individual.net Pq25NuuTe0l2GNpyIAeKpQ6u1qKYi8czARwViLgBnh+wzQul8= X-Orig-Path: not-for-mail Cancel-Lock: sha1:0RXYSYkyk8TmIml3qJqEyhuiGec= User-Agent: tin/2.2.0-20131224 ("Lochindaal") (UNIX) (Linux/3.13.0-39-generic (x86_64)) Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.java.programmer:30330 Gordon Levi wrote: > Microsoft did to me with Visual Basic classic. They made all my VB > programs obsolete. Van Rossum released Python 3 which is not backwards > compatible with Python 2! ... but it's fairly close. You can't expect a language (or anything else) to progress for ever without some incompatibility with earlier versions. Even within the 2.x tree there are minor incompatibilities. If you write code in good style for Python 2.7 it will quite often work in 3.x as well. -- Chris Green ยท