Path: csiph.com!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Daniele Futtorovic Newsgroups: comp.lang.java.programmer Subject: Re: Inclusive or exclusive array Date: Thu, 1 Aug 2019 00:44:09 +0200 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 20 Message-ID: References: <87zhkvmqx8.fsf@munus.decebal.nl> <87v9vjmkkn.fsf@munus.decebal.nl> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Date: Wed, 31 Jul 2019 22:45:16 -0000 (UTC) Injection-Info: reader02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="dc5adc3970271b1c4eebecdb9e3ca5c7"; logging-data="12568"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19Z/vrFpX/aZd80TCn3f8SS" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.8.0 Cancel-Lock: sha1:bGa+X3cJKAJz1XNauEjgQoo778M= In-Reply-To: X-Antivirus-Status: Clean Content-Language: en-US X-Antivirus: AVG (VPS 190731-0, 07/31/2019), Outbound message Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.java.programmer:39049 On 2019-07-31 13:22, Eric Sosman wrote: > On 7/30/2019 8:19 PM, Daniele Futtorovic wrote: >> [...] >> To be clear, what Eric was trying to say, was that likely the most >> common idiom of the sort, in Java, is: >> >> [zero-based-index-inclusive, *length*] > >     Sorry if I was too telegraphic, but that's not what I meant. > What I *did* mean was > >     - (inclusive start, exclusive end) is most common >     - (inclusive start, length) is seen, less commonly >     - (inclusive start, inclusive end) is seen, but is rare Whoopsie, then. Thanks for correcting me. -- DF.