Path: csiph.com!aioe.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: =?UTF-8?Q?Arne_Vajh=c3=b8j?= Newsgroups: comp.lang.java.programmer Subject: Re: Java 10 Date: Sat, 24 Mar 2018 11:27:53 -0400 Organization: Aioe.org NNTP Server Lines: 31 Message-ID: References: <85cc4efe-f6b5-4395-8179-229920862194@googlegroups.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: PBuS014lhzVyHjLbXmo/ZQ.user.gioia.aioe.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Complaints-To: abuse@aioe.org User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.6.0 Content-Language: en-US X-Notice: Filtered by postfilter v. 0.8.3 Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.java.programmer:38203 On 3/23/2018 3:36 PM, Knute Johnson wrote: > On 3/23/2018 1:26 PM, Arne Vajhøj wrote: >> But they also said that they were investigating options. >> >> A model with a basic JDK/JRE as a bottom layer and then >> having various silos on top of that: >> * Java EE >> * Java desktop >> * etc. >> could in my opinion be a good model. > > I think you are right on that score. > >> Question is whether there is sufficient interest for >> desktop to make it happen. > > It's really nice being able to write one set of code and run it on three > different desktops.  It has allowed us on one occasion to make the OS > decision after the software was well along. Yes. Java made WORA a reality. >   You think they'll keep it > going if I ask nicely :-) Nope. But if one day a separate Eclipse project "Java Desktop" opens up, then it may not hurt to show some interest. Arne