Path: csiph.com!news.redatomik.org!aioe.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: =?UTF-8?Q?Arne_Vajh=c3=b8j?= Newsgroups: comp.lang.java.programmer Subject: Re: JavaFX disappearing in Java 11 Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2018 20:17:24 -0400 Organization: Aioe.org NNTP Server Lines: 34 Message-ID: References: <5693ba0c-1be2-4f0a-a8f4-6a33e4b2be7a@googlegroups.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: PBuS014lhzVyHjLbXmo/ZQ.user.gioia.aioe.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Complaints-To: abuse@aioe.org User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.6.0 Content-Language: en-US X-Notice: Filtered by postfilter v. 0.8.3 Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.java.programmer:38163 On 3/11/2018 12:59 PM, Gianluca Bonetti wrote: > Il giorno giovedì 8 marzo 2018 20:10:57 UTC+1, Chris Riesbeck ha scritto: >> https://www.infoworld.com/article/3261066/java/javafx-will-be-removed-from-the-java-jdk.html >> >> While I won't miss JavaFX per se, just this morning I changed some code >> to use java.util.javafx.Pair. >> >> I can still use java.util.AbstractMap.SimpleImmutableEntry, or roll my >> own, but, jeepers, my timing was off. >> >> And yes, I've read this great thread on whether a Pair is good idea: >> >> http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/core-libs-dev/2010-March/thread.html#3973 > > There is still OpenJFX > https://wiki.openjdk.java.net/display/OpenJFX/Main From the announcement: Oracle fully open sourced JavaFX through “OpenJFX” in 2011, and continues to contribute to its open-source development. ... Consequently: * Oracle will continue to support JavaFX new fixes for Java SE 8 until 2022. * Having open sourced JavaFX and related tools, Oracle is working with interested third parties to make it easier to build and maintain JavaFX as a separately distributable open-source module. Arne