Path: csiph.com!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Stanimir Stamenkov Newsgroups: comp.lang.java.programmer Subject: Re: Web services/SOA - The right way Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2016 16:23:13 +0300 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 35 Message-ID: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2016 13:23:14 -0000 (UTC) Injection-Info: mx02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="eca23f05cb49d554ff3b985a27fc0a37"; logging-data="6876"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/jACGbUIibqxg2dN1CYQRf" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:48.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/48.0 SeaMonkey/2.45 In-Reply-To: X-Face: "@)%Vlap6d%OVYDS}B4YUWE@yUy+^!w/+.q.,c5kjI#+uG?kYP&r/pTjNWgo:g[A,O=AL3/ j&4Le2cau$>> >>> >>> each request from client to server must contain all of the >>> information >>> necessary to understand the request, and cannot take advantage >>> of any >>> stored context on the server. Session state is therefore kept >>> entirely >>> on the client. >>> >> >> The relevant resource content/state is certainly always available >> when processing a request. > > Completely stateless if difficult in practice. Stateless is an illusion – the resource itself holds/represents a state... > But it is still not the same as using the session object to store > service related data. though the state is not user session specific, yes. I still think people read specifications too literally, and likely miss the basics. -- Stanimir