Path: csiph.com!aioe.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: =?UTF-8?Q?Arne_Vajh=c3=b8j?= Newsgroups: comp.lang.java.programmer Subject: Re: Web services/SOA - The right way Date: Wed, 24 Aug 2016 20:23:13 -0400 Organization: Aioe.org NNTP Server Lines: 27 Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: 7SK6yTFfqwlIPNBLl3l7Qg.user.gioia.aioe.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Complaints-To: abuse@aioe.org User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.2.0 X-Notice: Filtered by postfilter v. 0.8.2 Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.java.programmer:35447 On 8/24/2016 7:47 AM, Richard Maher wrote: > On 24-Aug-16 7:17 AM, Arne Vajhøj wrote: >> If you are integrating with an ESB in the 100K$ per CPU license >> class then they love contract first WSDL and SOAP with lots of >> extra WS-* standards. > > If your Aunt had balls she'd be your Uncle. > > The Jury's been and gone; the verdict is REST. Different contexts means different choices. There are a lot more smartphones and web browsers out there than expensive ESB's, but that does not make those ESB's non-existant. > What, if anything, takes the place of WS-Transaction et al is yet to be > seen. Theoretical approach is that RESTful implies no need for transactions so a need for transaction not true RESTful. In practice I think many solutions use a compensating model for recovery. Arne