Path: csiph.com!news.swapon.de!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!mx02.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Eric Sosman Newsgroups: comp.lang.java.programmer Subject: Re: how does one explain this syntax? Date: Mon, 23 May 2016 07:32:36 -0400 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 27 Message-ID: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Date: Mon, 23 May 2016 11:29:01 -0000 (UTC) Injection-Info: mx02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="2d081e2f7155c28005d4472f67c2f43d"; logging-data="7961"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+wRu+z4f3C0fMd/kS+eoLZ" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.1.0 In-Reply-To: Cancel-Lock: sha1:0Bd74YUqXIYq1OfaOyFMvEgix5Q= Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.java.programmer:34379 On 5/23/2016 1:13 AM, Knute Johnson wrote: > On 5/22/2016 13:22, Robert Klemme wrote: >> And why not do this instead? >> >> for (final Entry entry : tmap.entrySet()) >> System.out.printf("key is: %d & value is: %s\n", entry.getKey(), >> entry.getValue()); >> >> Note: tmap.get(key) is usually less efficient than fetching the value >> from an Entry. >> >> Kind regards >> >> robert > > I'll bite, why is it less efficient? It doesn't need to re-search the map. Admittedly, Map.Entry is an interface rather than a class, so it's not a given that the getKey() and getValue() implementations are one-liners. It seems highly likely, though -- and in the case of TreeMap, both methods are in fact trivial. -- esosman@comcast-dot-net.invalid "Don't be afraid of work. Make work afraid of you." -- TLM