Path: csiph.com!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!mx02.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.java.programmer
Subject: Re: questions re Javascript
Date: Sat, 3 Oct 2015 10:48:00 -0400
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 56
Message-ID: <muopmr$dds$2@dont-email.me>
References: <cef9fe09-3475-485e-bd05-28796e775945@googlegroups.com> <msfgbb$945$1@dont-email.me> <83722e36-4afe-4077-b936-229450613698@googlegroups.com> <mu0g9p$ljt$1@dont-email.me> <mu0mbs$ak9$1@dont-email.me> <mu1hnf$sq8$1@dont-email.me> <mu1o2i$ljj$1@dont-email.me> <mu22an$scg$1@dont-email.me> <mu2a20$icf$1@speranza.aioe.org> <mu2bnj$geu$1@dont-email.me> <mu2cj1$msa$1@speranza.aioe.org> <mu3jmu$dep$1@dont-email.me> <mua269$d3r$1@speranza.aioe.org> <muaab6$f1u$1@dont-email.me> <munfjv$gtn$5@speranza.aioe.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Sat, 3 Oct 2015 14:45:47 +0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: mx02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="8b88f1819ae50b8afa97a5cef254b303"; logging-data="13756"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/biWTSsx2QhfqueMboddVdQOQ/dtnVMa8="
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.2.0
In-Reply-To: <munfjv$gtn$5@speranza.aioe.org>
Cancel-Lock: sha1:WBjEEvpULUoy01Qh+yX1sGwdmRo=
Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.java.programmer:32783

On 10/2/2015 10:47 PM, Arne Vajhøj wrote:
> On 9/27/2015 10:59 PM, Jerry Stuckle wrote:
>> On 9/27/2015 8:38 PM, Arne Vajhøj wrote:
>>> On 9/25/2015 9:56 AM, Jerry Stuckle wrote:
>>>> result is machine code.  However, an additional step is required to
>>>> link
>>>> in necessary libraries and other files.
>>>>
>>>> That does not mean the output of the compiler is not machine code. 
>>>> It's
>>>> just not executable-ready machine code.  Once the link step is done,
>>>> the
>>>> program is ready to run without any other program such as a jvm.
>>>
>>> Exactly.
>>>
>>> Which made the original claim of the output being directly executable
>>> false.
>>>
>>> It is not.
>>>
>>> The output from an additional step make it directly executable.
>>
>> I never said it was directly executable.  Those are your words.  I said
>> the output is machine code - which it is.
> 
> Not true.
> 
> Eternal hope wrote:
> 
> #Well when I went to school (jeez, was it *that* long ago)  a compiled
> #language was one where the compiler took source code as input and
> #produced native machine code that was directly executable on the
> #underlying hardware as output.
> 
> Lew replied:
> 
> #You misunderstood your classes.
> 
> You replied:
> 
> #No, he didn't.  It was that way in my classes in the 1960's and 1970's,
> #also.
> 
> Arne
> 

And yet once again you show your ignorance and lack of understanding.
But that's quite normal for you.

-- 
==================
Remove the "x" from my email address
Jerry Stuckle
jstucklex@attglobal.net
==================