Path: csiph.com!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!mx02.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Jeff Higgins Newsgroups: comp.lang.java.programmer Subject: Re: can you give me some hints on the Oracle Java SE related certificates? Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2015 16:49:11 -0400 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 36 Message-ID: References: <92ec7821-b17d-4af8-9c99-8a7649fa64ec@googlegroups.com> <4245d965-6d79-4bdf-accd-dc51520d3273@googlegroups.com> <313f817e-9d7c-4939-a971-7e2b2a85d35f@googlegroups.com> <430f5ded-3382-476a-ae5e-ef12427e1542@googlegroups.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2015 20:48:52 +0000 (UTC) Injection-Info: mx02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="a78aad8b483612fbf45d18e918df0cca"; logging-data="15279"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+u2c1LzSA24oncuZx9lu3wySP9PpD7VxE=" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Icedove/31.8.0 In-Reply-To: Cancel-Lock: sha1:gITmhUA8RQpUhLItvB2mrjaRMOk= Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.java.programmer:32639 On 09/22/2015 04:47 PM, Jeff Higgins wrote: > On 09/22/2015 03:15 PM, Jeff Higgins wrote: >> On 09/21/2015 09:47 PM, Jeff Higgins wrote: >> >> ...If I were to present a discourse on "Inheritance in Java"... >> >> After writing that I thought maybe discourse was the wrong word. >> So I looked it up on Wikipedia and here is a short quote from that >> article. >> >> « >> Moreover, because discourses are bodies of text meant to communicate >> specific data, information, and knowledge, there exist internal >> relations within a given discourse, and external relations among >> discourses, because a discourse does not exist in isolation (per se), >> but in relation to other discourses, which are determined and >> established by means of inter discourse and interdiscursivity. Hence, >> within a field of intellectual enquiry, the practitioners occasionally >> debate “What is” and “What is not” discourse, according to the >> conceptual meanings (denotation and connotation) used in the given >> field of study. >> » >> >> Java (multiple) inheritance >> >> > > Which might be why both the current keepers of the Java language, and > the "father of the Java language" chose a divide and conquer approach > to the concept of multiple inheritance in the Java language. > "Multiple Inheritance of State, Implementation, and Type" vs > "Java does not support multiple inheritance" > > It makes discourse much easier and pleasant.